COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY

Splenic embolization revisited: a multicenter review

James M Haan, Walter Biffl, M Margaret Knudson, Kimberly A Davis, Tomomi Oka, Sarah Majercik, Rochelle Dicker, Shelley Marder, Thomas M Scalea
Journal of Trauma 2004, 56 (3): 542-7
15128125

BACKGROUND: Splenic embolization can increase nonoperative salvage. However, complications are not clearly defined. A retrospective multicenter review was performed to delineate the risks and benefits of splenic embolization.

METHODS: A retrospective chart review of all patients undergoing splenic embolization from 1997 to 2002 at four separate Level I trauma centers was performed. Reviewed results included patient demographics, admission and follow-up computed tomographic scan results, angiographic technique, and patient outcomes including splenic salvage rate and procedural complications.

RESULTS: A total of 140 patients were reviewed. The majority were young male patients involved in motor vehicle crashes. These patients had high abdominal computed tomographic grades of splenic injury and moderate Injury Severity Scores. The splenic salvage rate was 87%, which decreased with increasing injury grade. However, over 80% of splenic injury grades 4 and 5 were successfully managed nonoperatively. Significant hemoperitoneum did not affect success, but the presence of arteriovenous fistula was associated with a high failure rate, even with embolization. Salvage rates were similar between main coil and subselective embolization groups. Patients over 55 years of age did no worse than younger patients. Major complications included bleeding in 16 patients; 6 splenic abscesses, with 5 patients requiring splenectomy; and 1 episode of arterial injury requiring operative repair.

CONCLUSION: Splenic embolization remains a valuable technique in splenic salvage, especially in higher grade injuries. Complications are common but do not seem to affect outcome.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
15128125
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"