COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A comparative study of antibody titers of blister fluid and serum in patients with subepidermal immunobullous diseases.

BACKGROUND: Subepidermal autoimmune bullous diseases (SABD) comprise several disorders, such as bullous pemphigoid (BP), cicatricial pemphigoid (CP), epidermolysis bullosa acquisita (EBA), herpes gestationis (HG), and linear immunoglobulin A (IgA) dermatosis (LAD), and are characterized by antibody production against the basement membrane structures of the skin and mucosa. Although indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) on serum is a routine test for the detection of basement membrane zone antibodies, there have only been a few studies related to IIF on blister fluid. Aim To perform IIF on blister fluid and to compare the results with those of serum.

METHODS: IIF on salt-split skin was performed on the serum and blister fluid of 35 patients with SABD (25 bp, three EBA, three HG, three LAD, and one bullous systemic lupus erythematosus) with conjugated IgG, IgA, and C3.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight of the 35 patients showed IIF-positive blister fluid with a titer similar or less than that of serum. In 25 patients with BP, the most common disease in this study, 23 cases (92%) had positive IIF on serum, 23 cases (92%) on blister fluid, and 24 cases (96%) on either serum or blister fluid. Immunoreactant titers in BP blister fluid and serum did not show significant differences (P > 0.05). Epidermal binding of immunoreactants was the most prevalent staining pattern of IIF on salt-split skin (92%) in BP.

CONCLUSIONS: From the findings of this study, the blister fluid of patients with SABD can be used for IIF. Although IIF sensitivity on blister fluid is no more than that on serum, the performance of this test on blister fluid in addition to serum may reduce the number of false negative results of IIF found using either of these two substrates alone.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app