Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparison of antireflux surgery among ethnicity.

UNLABELLED: African Americans appear less likely than caucasians to undergo surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). When they do, they appear to have higher conversion and complication rates. Nevertheless, satisfaction with surgery is similar to caucasians.

BACKGROUND: There is little information comparing the prevalence and treatment of GERD in various ethnic populations. The purpose of this study was to examine the variations in outcomes between caucasians and African Americans undergoing antireflux surgery.

METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent antireflux surgery for GERD or paraesophageal hernia by a single surgeon from January 1997 through December 2001 were reviewed for preoperative and postoperative symptoms, complications, and postoperative satisfaction with surgery.

RESULTS: Of the 204 procedures performed, 198 patients were either African American (24) or caucasian (174). Of the 18 African Americans undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS), five were converted to open and four had grade-1 or -2 complications. Of the 160 caucasians undergoing LARS, 27 were converted, and 17 had grade-1, -2, or -3 complications. African-American females had a heavier weight (222 lbs. versus 175 lbs., p<0.05) and conversion rate (55% versus 18%, p<0.05), compared to caucasian females. Satisfaction rates for African Americans were 88%, compared to 82% for caucasians.

CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated significant differences between conversion rates in African Americans and caucasians with respects to frequency of surgery for GERD and conversion rates for LARS. Nevertheless, African Americans appear more satisfied with their surgical outcome. Further research is needed to determine whether African Americans truly have a lower incidence of GERD or if bias exists in referral patterns or cultural attitudes.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app