Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Long-term superiority of composite versus muscle-only free flaps for skull coverage.

Long-term follow-up of free flaps used for skull coverage in this experience has revealed that serious sequela are more likely after muscle-only free flaps. Over the past 2 decades, 8 muscle and 6 composite free flaps have been used in 12 patients. Debulking was the only secondary procedure necessary in 1 composite flap. However, implant extrusion through 1 muscle flap and chronic ulcerations after minor trauma in 2 other muscle flaps could be directly attributed to the thinness of these flaps. Whether these problems were a consequence of inevitable muscle atrophy or improper selection of too thin a muscle flap from the outset is unknown. Thus, it must be suggested that either a composite flap or a known thick muscle should be chosen initially if a permanent trouble-free outcome is to be expected.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app