We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[At what time is a reduction of medical under- or overtreatment sensible? Treatment of acute depression as an example].
Psychiatrische Praxis 2004 April
OBJECTIVE: 1) To portray the mathematical relationship between the size of an underuse or overuse problem caused by non-compliance of health professionals and the cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement program; 2) to demonstrate the applicability of the models to a real-world problem (underuse and overuse in the treatment of major depression) and to stress the importance of the costs of a quality improvement program using this example.
METHODS: Mathematical formulation of the relationship between the costs of a quality improvement program and the degree of underuse and overuse.
RESULTS: The example of reducing underuse in the treatment of major depression shows that an intervention with a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio may be economically unattractive if a quality improvement program incurs high costs secondary to a small quality deficit. The application example also shows that reducing treatment overuse is inefficient if overuse is small and hence the costs of a quality improvement program are higher than the costs of overuse.
CONCLUSIONS: The explicit consideration of the size of an underuse or overuse problem in the cost-effectiveness ratio of a quality improvement program may contribute to a more efficient use of health care resources.
METHODS: Mathematical formulation of the relationship between the costs of a quality improvement program and the degree of underuse and overuse.
RESULTS: The example of reducing underuse in the treatment of major depression shows that an intervention with a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio may be economically unattractive if a quality improvement program incurs high costs secondary to a small quality deficit. The application example also shows that reducing treatment overuse is inefficient if overuse is small and hence the costs of a quality improvement program are higher than the costs of overuse.
CONCLUSIONS: The explicit consideration of the size of an underuse or overuse problem in the cost-effectiveness ratio of a quality improvement program may contribute to a more efficient use of health care resources.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app