JOURNAL ARTICLE

rhBMP-2 significantly enhances guided bone regeneration

Ulf M E Wikesjö, Mohammed Qahash, Robert C Thomson, Alonzo D Cook, Michael D Rohrer, John M Wozney, W Ross Hardwick
Clinical Oral Implants Research 2004, 15 (2): 194-204
15008931

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a limited potential for bone augmentation following guided bone regeneration (GBR) in horizontal alveolar defects. Surgical implantation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) significantly enhances bone regeneration in such defects; however, sufficient quantities of bone for implant dentistry are not routinely obtained. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of rhBMP-2/ACS to enhance GBR using a space-providing, macro-porous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) device.

METHODS: Bilateral, critical size, supra-alveolar, peri-implant defects were surgically created in four Hound Labrador mongrel dogs. Two turned and one surface-etched 10-mm titanium dental implant were placed 5 mm into the surgically reduced alveolar ridge creating 5-mm supra-alveolar defects. rhBMP-2/ACS (rhBMP-2 at 0.2 mg/ml) or buffer/ACS was randomly assigned to left and right jaw quadrants in subsequent animals. The space-providing, macro-porous ePTFE device was placed to cover rhBMP-2/ACS and control constructs and dental implants. Gingival flaps were advanced for primary wound closure. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery for histologic and histometric analysis.

RESULTS: Bone formation was significantly enhanced in defects receiving rhBMP-2/ACS compared to control. Vertical bone gain averaged (+/- SD) 4.7 +/- 0.3 and 4.8 +/- 0.1 mm, and new bone area 10.3 +/- 2.0 and 8.0 +/- 2.5 mm2 at turned and surface-etched dental implants, respectively. Corresponding values for the control were 1.8 +/- 2.0 and 1.3 +/- 1.3 mm, and 1.8 +/- 1.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm2. Bone-implant contact in rhBMP-2-induced bone averaged 6.4 +/- 1.4% and 9.6 +/- 7.5% for turned and surface-etched dental implants, respectively (P=0.399). Corresponding values for the control were 14.6 +/- 19.4% and 23.7 +/- 9.7% (P=0.473). Bone-implant contact in resident bone ranged between 43% and 58% without significant differences between dental implant surfaces.

CONCLUSIONS: rhBMP-2/ACS significantly enhances GBR at turned and surface-etched dental implants. The dental implant surface technology does not appear to substantially influence bone formation.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
15008931
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"