JOURNAL ARTICLE

Diagnosis of noncalcareous hydronephrosis: role of magnetic resonance urography and noncontrast computed tomography

Ahmed A Shokeir, Tarek El-Diasty, Waleed Eassa, Ahmed Mosbah, Tarek Mohsen, Osama Mansour, Mohamed Dawaba, Hamdy El-Kappany
Urology 2004, 63 (2): 225-9
14972458

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of magnetic resonance urography (MRU) and noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) in the diagnosis of noncalcareous hydronephrosis when excretory urography (intravenous urography) is either contraindicated or inconclusive.

METHODS: A total 108 consecutive patients with noncalcareous hydronephrosis were included in this study. In all patients, intravenous urography was either contraindicated or could not determine the diagnosis. In all patients, calculus obstruction was excluded by NCCT and all underwent heavily T2-weighted MRU. The final definitive diagnosis was established by retrograde or antegrade ureterography, endoscopy, or open surgery and was considered the reference standard for the diagnosis of obstruction. Normal kidneys in patients with unilateral obstruction were considered the reference standard for the absence of obstruction. The results of MRU were compared with those of NCCT regarding sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy.

RESULTS: Of the 108 patients, 5 had bilateral obstruction and the remaining 103 had unilateral obstruction. Of the latter group, 5 had a solitary kidney; therefore, the total number of renal units was 211 (113 obstructed and 98 normal units). Ureteral strictures were identified by NCCT in 15 (28%) of 54 and by MRU in 45 (83%) of 54 patients. Bladder, ureter, or prostate tumors causing ureteral obstruction could be diagnosed in one half of the 54 patients with such tumors by NCCT (27 of 54) and in all but 2 patients by MRU (52 of 54). Both NCCT and MRU could identify all extraurinary causes of obstruction. Overall, of the 113 kidneys with noncalculus obstruction, the cause could be identified by MRU in 102 (sensitivity of 90%) and by NCCT in 47 (sensitivity of 42%), a difference of statistically significant value in favor of MRU (P <0.001). The specificity of T2-weighted MRU and NCCT was 100% and 99%, respectively (not a statistically significant difference). The overall accuracy of T2-weighted MRU and NCCT was 95% and 68%, respectively (P <0.001).

CONCLUSIONS: In patients with ureteral obstruction in whom intravenous urography is not helpful and after NCCT has excluded stone disease, heavily T2-weighted MRU is a sensitive and specific method in the identification of the cause of obstruction.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
14972458
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"