JOURNAL ARTICLE

The reliability of assessment criteria for undergraduate medical students' communication skills portfolios: the Nottingham experience

Charlotte E Rees, Charlotte E Sheard
Medical Education 2004, 38 (2): 138-44
14871384

INTRODUCTION: Some educators have argued that portfolios should not be assessed summatively because there is little evidence supporting the reliability of their assessment. This study aims to determine the reliability of assessment criteria used for a portfolio at the University of Nottingham.

METHODS: Two independent analysts assessed a random sample of portfolios (n = 100, 49.5%) using criterion-referenced assessment. Students' performances were examined against subjective items in five areas: 1) portfolio structure, 2) level of critical reflection, 3) level of skills development, 4) use of documentary evidence, and 5) use of relevant literature. These subjective judgements were later converted into quantitative scales ranging from 0 to 3 so that interrater reliability could be established. The level of agreement between the two analysts for the total percentage score was established using an intraclass correlation coefficient and for the individual items using weighted kappa coefficients.

RESULTS: The level of agreement between the two raters for the total percentage score was 0.771 (95% CI = 0.678, 0.840), as measured by an intraclass correlation coefficient. The levels of agreement between the two raters for the individual items of the assessment criteria ranged from kappa=0.359 (item 3) to kappa=0.693 (item 4).

DISCUSSION: This study provides some support for the summative assessment of portfolios. The findings suggest that discussion and negotiation between independent assessors can enhance the reliability of assessment criteria. Therefore, medical educators are encouraged to use such procedures in the summative assessment of portfolios.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
14871384
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"