JOURNAL ARTICLE

Abbreviated mycophenolic acid AUC from C0, C1, C2, and C4 is preferable in children after renal transplantation on mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus therapy

Guido Filler
Transplant International 2004, 17 (3): 120-5
14749919
In order to allow a similar algorithm to be used for both adults and children on tacrolimus-based and mycophenolate mofetil [MMF, a pro-drug for mycophenolic acid (MPA)]-based immunosuppression, a limited sampling technique from the trough level (C0) and the levels 30 min (C0.5) and 2 h (C2) after intake was to be developed from MPA area under the time-concentration curves (AUC). We retrospectively analyzed 49 full ten-point pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles from 29 pediatric patients on MMF and tacrolimus. We used stepwise multiple regression analysis to calculate limited sampling approaches. Agreement with the AUC was tested by means of Bland and Altman analysis. The correlation between AUC and pre-dose trough concentration was r(2)=0.5188 ( P<0.0001) and between AUC and post-dose trough concentration r(2)=0.6924 ( P<0.0001). The next best correlations were with 2 h (C2, r(2)=0.6711, P<0.0001), 4 h (C4, r(2)=0.6411, P<0.0001), 1.5 h (C1.5, r(2)=0.6344, P<0.0001), and 6 h (C6, r(2)=0.6219, P<0.0001). Three-point estimates at C0, C0.5, and C2 resulted in an acceptable correlation between predicted AUC and AUC from the full profile when we used the formula AUC = 10.01391+3.94791xC0+3.24253xC0.5+1.0108xC2, Pearson's r=0.8996, 95% confidence interval 0.8277-0.9424. However, even better results could be obtained when we used AUC = 8.217+3.163xC0+0.994xC1+1.334xC2+4.183xC4, Pearson's r=0.9456, 95% confidence interval 0.9051-0.9691. Bland and Altman analysis revealed good agreement between AUC predicted from C0, C0.5, and C2 and AUC from the full profile, but was inferior to the four-point approach. Also, the previously reported formula derived for adults was not usable in these patients. A special formula must be used for children. The AUC of MPA can be predicted by limited sampling including C0, C0.5, and C2, while an approach using C0, C1, C2, and C4 is preferable.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
14749919
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"