Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

An independent comparison of terbinafine and itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis.

BACKGROUND: Previously, sponsored publications have shown that either terbinafine or itraconazole (pulse regimen) are effective for patients with toenail onychomycosis. However, independent comparative studies are lacking.

OBJECTIVES: To objectively compare treatment with terbinafine and itraconazole in patients with toenail onychomycosis.

METHODS: The effectiveness of terbinafine (250 mg/day 3 months) versus itraconazole pulse regimen (400 mg/day for the first week of each month, for three cycles) was retrospectively evaluated in patients with toenail onychomycosis using mycological tests and subjective outcome measures. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way analyses of variance (ANOVA) for continuous variables and Fisher exact tests for categorical variables.

RESULTS: Included in the study were 117 patients (74 patients treated by terbinafine and 43 patients treated with itraconazole). Patients were examined at an average period of 20 months after the end of therapy. Mycological cure was observed in 70.6% and 62.8% of the patients who were treated by terbinafine or itraconazole, respectively (not statistically significant). Mean visual analogue scale assessment of treatment outcome was 79.9 mm (SD 24.7 mm) and 65.2 mm (SD 34.6 mm) for patients treated by terbinafine or itraconazole, respectively (p=0.008). When the results were stratified according to age and gender, it was observed that the advantage of terbinafine versus itraconazole retained statistical significance only for patients who were 55 years old and above, or females.

CONCLUSIONS: Mycological cure proportions were not statistically significant between patients treated by terbinafine or itraconazole for toenail onychomycosis. However, better subjective outcome measures indicated an advantage for terbinafine over itraconazole, noticeable in females and patients 55 years old and above.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app