JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY

The utility of tolonium chloride rinse in the diagnosis of recurrent or second primary cancers in patients with prior upper aerodigestive tract cancer

Joel B Epstein, Roy Feldman, Rowena J Dolor, Stephen R Porter
Head & Neck 2003, 25 (11): 911-21
14603451

BACKGROUND: The clinical utility of tolonium chloride rinse was compared with unaided visual examination alone in the diagnosis of oral carcinoma in patients previously treated for carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract.

METHODS: A total of 668 patients were enrolled in this multicenter study. At each site, an oral clinical visual examination was completed by one investigator followed by tolonium chloride rinse and examination by a second investigator blinded to the examination findings of the first investigator. If a lesion was considered suspicious (urgent biopsy required at the first visit), the lesion was biopsied after tolonium chloride rinsing. Patients with lesions characterized at the first visit as not suspicious (biopsy not urgent) or that stained with tolonium chloride were asked to return for a second visit. At the second visit, any residual lesion or lesions that retained tolonium chloride were biopsied.

RESULTS: A total of 96 biopsies was performed in 81 of the 668 patients (12.1%), of which 30 (31.3%) were diagnosed histologically as carcinoma/carcinoma in situ (CIS) and the remainder as inflammation (31.3%), keratosis (26.6%), dysplasia (21.9%), ulcer (2.1%), other (3.1%), or no abnormality (1.0%). Of the 30 lesions with the diagnosis of carcinoma/CIS, 12 (sensitivity 40.0%) were considered to be clinically suspicious (CS+), whereas 29 (sensitivity 96.7%) retained tolonium chloride (p =.0002). The predictive values of a positive test for clinical examination and tolonium chloride staining were similar (36.4% vs 32.6%; p =.5871), indicating that the greater sensitivity of tolonium chloride was not associated with an excessive number of unnecessary biopsies (false positives).

CONCLUSIONS: Tolonium chloride rinse is more sensitive than clinical examination alone in detecting lesions that might be found on biopsy to be carcinoma or CIS. The increased sensitivity is largely attributed to lesions that stain but were not detected clinically on visual examination.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Related Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
14603451
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"

We want to hear from doctors like you!

Take a second to answer a survey question.