CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Tolerability and cardiovascular complications of outpatient diagnostic minihysteroscopy compared with conventional hysteroscopy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess acceptability and cardiovascular complications of hysteroscopy performed with minihysteroscopes compared with those performed with conventional hysteroscopes.

DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical trial (Canadian Task Force classification I).

SETTING: Academic research center.

PATIENTS: One hundred women with abnormal uterine bleeding.

INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopy with a 3.5-mm minihysteroscope or conventional 5-mm endoscope with no anesthesia.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Duration of examinations, pain, and occurrence of vasovagal reactions were recorded. Pain was assessed by visual analog scale ranging from zero to 20 before (pain expectancy) and at the end of the procedure. Occurrence of vasovagal reactions was assessed by monitoring blood pressure and pulse rate at 1-minute intervals during the procedure. A heart rate of less than 60/minute or a reduction greater than 20% compared with baseline was considered a vasovagal reaction; similarly, a reduction in blood pressure exceeding baseline value by 20% was considered a result of vagal stimulation. Mean duration was shorter for minihysteroscopy than for conventional hysteroscopy. The mean (SD) level of pain experienced during minihysteroscopy also was significantly lower (0.76 +/- 0.65 vs 1.46 +/- 0.86, 95% CI-1.0-0.4, p <0.0001). The number of instrumentally recorded (1 vs 11 cases) and clinical vasovagal reactions (0 vs 6 cases) was also significantly lower in the minihysteroscopy group than in the conventional hysteroscopy group (p <0.002 and <0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION: New-generation minihysteroscopes make hysteroscopy easier and less painful, and carry a lower risk of vasovagal reactions than hysteroscopy performed with conventional instruments. In our experience, minihysteroscopy with vaginoscopic approach and saline distention is well tolerated, effective, and a true outpatient procedure.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app