We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
English Abstract
Journal Article
[Comparison of tolerance to sequential continuous positive airway pressure therapy between patients after classical and after modified uvulopalatopharyngoplasty].
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke za Zhi 2003 June
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) on postoperation continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS).
METHODS: 66 OSAHS patients underwent UPPP were recruited and all were followed up for more than 12 months. Among them 24 patients were treated with classical UPPP, 42 had modified UPPP treatment. The efficacy of surgery was compared between the two groups. The post-operation tolerance to CPAP pressure was tested during sleep CPAP titration in 24 classical UPPP patients and in 15 modified UPPP patients.
RESULTS: The validity ratio is 58.3% and 61.9% 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference between classical UPPP and modified UPPP in regard to surgery efficacy, and most of them need further CPAP therapy. During CPAP treatment, compared with untreated OSAHS patients, the highest CPAP pressure classical UPPP group could tolerant decreased significantly, however, classical UPPP group did not. 16.7% of classical UPPP patients had severe mouth air leak before optimal CPAP pressure was titrated, but none of the 15 post modified UPPP failed to sequential CPAP therapy.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy was similar between modified UPPP and classical UPPP treatment, post modified UPPP patients had better tolerance to sequential CPAP treatment. It may be better to treat OSAHS patients with modified UPPP instead of classical UPPP.
METHODS: 66 OSAHS patients underwent UPPP were recruited and all were followed up for more than 12 months. Among them 24 patients were treated with classical UPPP, 42 had modified UPPP treatment. The efficacy of surgery was compared between the two groups. The post-operation tolerance to CPAP pressure was tested during sleep CPAP titration in 24 classical UPPP patients and in 15 modified UPPP patients.
RESULTS: The validity ratio is 58.3% and 61.9% 12 months after operation. There was no significant difference between classical UPPP and modified UPPP in regard to surgery efficacy, and most of them need further CPAP therapy. During CPAP treatment, compared with untreated OSAHS patients, the highest CPAP pressure classical UPPP group could tolerant decreased significantly, however, classical UPPP group did not. 16.7% of classical UPPP patients had severe mouth air leak before optimal CPAP pressure was titrated, but none of the 15 post modified UPPP failed to sequential CPAP therapy.
CONCLUSION: The efficacy was similar between modified UPPP and classical UPPP treatment, post modified UPPP patients had better tolerance to sequential CPAP treatment. It may be better to treat OSAHS patients with modified UPPP instead of classical UPPP.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app