COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Nasal fracture manipulation: a comparative study of general and local anaesthesia techniques.

Nasal injuries are common conditions treated in either Otolaryngology or Plastic Surgical departments. Manipulation for deformity can be conducted in various ways. The aim of this study is to determine if the anaesthetic technique used for manipulation influences outcomes. Five hundred and fifty-five patients had either local anaesthetic (LA) or general anaesthetic (GA) nasal fracture manipulations in our departments over a 6-year period. Three hundred and twenty-four of these could be contacted and questioned as to subsequent surgical treatments received. Rhinoplasty, septorhinoplasty or septoplasty had been subsequently performed in 3.2% of the GA group and in 17.2% of the LA group (P < 0.0001). We recommend considering this result when treating nasal fractures in conjunction with other important issues of patient preference, financial costs, associated risks, morbidity and facilities available.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app