We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Interrater reliability and content validity of a minimal data set to measure outcomes of students receiving school-based occupational therapy and physical therapy.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The 1997 Amendments of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act increased the emphasis on accountability for outcomes of students with disabilities in the United States. The purpose of this study was to determine the content validity and estimate the interrater reliability of the School Outcomes Measure, a new minimal data set to measure groups of students' performance in the areas addressed by school-based therapy.
METHOD: Forty-five occupational therapists and physical therapists working in Oklahoma's public schools participated in the content validity study. Eight occupational therapist-physical therapist pairs rated 17 students for the interrater reliability study. Therapists were recruited and data were collected by mail for both studies.
RESULTS: Most validity study participants thought the tool was comprehensive and clear, and that they could complete the tool twice a year for their students. The weighted kappa statistic indicated that the therapists' agreement was substantial (.73) to almost perfect (.96) for 25 of the 28 student functional status items.
DISCUSSION: The results support the content validity and interrater reliability of the items. This study was an initial step in development of the tool and further studies are needed in the validation process.
METHOD: Forty-five occupational therapists and physical therapists working in Oklahoma's public schools participated in the content validity study. Eight occupational therapist-physical therapist pairs rated 17 students for the interrater reliability study. Therapists were recruited and data were collected by mail for both studies.
RESULTS: Most validity study participants thought the tool was comprehensive and clear, and that they could complete the tool twice a year for their students. The weighted kappa statistic indicated that the therapists' agreement was substantial (.73) to almost perfect (.96) for 25 of the 28 student functional status items.
DISCUSSION: The results support the content validity and interrater reliability of the items. This study was an initial step in development of the tool and further studies are needed in the validation process.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app