We have located links that may give you full text access.
CASE REPORTS
CLINICAL TRIAL
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Glatiramer acetate treatment in patients with childhood and juvenile onset multiple sclerosis.
Neuropediatrics 2003 June
BACKGROUND: Recent data indicate that in multiple sclerosis disease onset before the age of 16 is more common than previously assumed. However, current therapeutic options are limited to the treatment of acute attacks in these patients. Glatiramer acetate has been successfully applied in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, but there are no data available about the use of glatiramer acetate in childhood and juvenile onset multiple sclerosis.
METHODS: Seven patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and disease onset between 9 and 16 years of age were treated with daily subcutaneous injection of 20 mg glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). Patients were followed for 24 months. Treatment was initiated in all patients before the age of 18.
RESULTS: The use of glatiramer acetate in our cohort of early onset multiple sclerosis patients was safe and well tolerated. Two out of seven patients remained relapse-free during the two year period. Clinical disability as measured by the EDSS remained stable in three out of seven patients.
CONCLUSION: Due to the small number of patients the efficacy of the treatment has to be interpreted with caution. However, there might be a more pronounced treatment benefit in patients with low disability at treatment initiation and early treatment onset.
METHODS: Seven patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis and disease onset between 9 and 16 years of age were treated with daily subcutaneous injection of 20 mg glatiramer acetate (Copaxone). Patients were followed for 24 months. Treatment was initiated in all patients before the age of 18.
RESULTS: The use of glatiramer acetate in our cohort of early onset multiple sclerosis patients was safe and well tolerated. Two out of seven patients remained relapse-free during the two year period. Clinical disability as measured by the EDSS remained stable in three out of seven patients.
CONCLUSION: Due to the small number of patients the efficacy of the treatment has to be interpreted with caution. However, there might be a more pronounced treatment benefit in patients with low disability at treatment initiation and early treatment onset.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Cardiovascular Disease in Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease.Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023 November 9
Monitoring Macro- and Microcirculation in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review.Avicenna Journal of Medicine 2023 July
Urinary tract infections: a review of the current diagnostics landscape.Journal of Medical Microbiology 2023 November
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app