We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Regression of left ventricular hypertrophy during 10 years after valve replacement for aortic stenosis is related to the preoperative risk profile.
European Heart Journal 2003 August
BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that regression of hypertrophy may be the underlying determinant of longevity and left ventricular function after valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). The potential for hypertrophy regression could therefore be related to the preoperative risk profile.
METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients with AS had a "project" Doppler-echo and radionuclide ventriculography in addition to the standard investigation programme prior to AVR with a disc valve (19-29mm, n=82), a caged ball valve (26-29mm, n=8), or a stented porcine valve (26mm, n=1); 49 (group A) were selected for a serial follow-up study while 42 served as controls (group B). Forty-two group A patients took part in a 1.5-year examination while 47 (26 group A, 21 group B) patients were studied at 10 years.
RESULTS: Groups A and B were comparable as regards all pre- and intra-operative data including left ventricular mass index (LVMi). A previously developed preoperative prognostic index (PI) separated the patients into groups with low (n=23), intermediary (n=19) and high risk (n=49) with 10-year survivals of 87%, 58% and 43% (P<0.01). LVMi dropped from 202+/-58g/m(2)preoperatively to 152+/-45g/m(2)(P<0.0001) at 1.5 years, and 139+/-40g/m(2)(P<0.0001) at 10 years (three and six patients, respectively, with paravalvular leak or mitral regurgitation excluded). PI correlated with preoperative (r=0.51, P<0.001), 1.5-year (r=0.46, P<0.01), and 10-year LVMi (r=0.41, P<0.01). Also preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction correlated with the three LVMi measurements. Patients with systemic hypertension had higher LVMi at 1.5 years (193+/-42, n=6 vs 144+/-42, n=33, P<0.05) and 10 years (175+/-39, n=12 vs 124+/-31g/m(2), n=29, P<0.001). Patients with low, intermediary or high PI, excluding those with hypertension, had 1.5-year LVMi of 110+/-35 (n=8), 134+/-43 (n=9) and 164+/-33g/m(2)(n=16; P<0.01), respectively, and 10-year LVMi of 116+/-25 (n=17), 126+/-27 (n=6), and 146+/-41g/m(2)(n=6; P<0.05), respectively. There was no relation between LVMi at 1.5 or 10 years and peak or mean Doppler gradient, prosthetic valve size, or valve size index.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular hypertrophy regression for patients who survived up to 10 years after AVR for AS is dependent on the preoperative risk profile indicating that irreversible myocardial disease is the underlying factor. Systemic hypertension is an important factor in its own right.
METHODS: Ninety-one consecutive patients with AS had a "project" Doppler-echo and radionuclide ventriculography in addition to the standard investigation programme prior to AVR with a disc valve (19-29mm, n=82), a caged ball valve (26-29mm, n=8), or a stented porcine valve (26mm, n=1); 49 (group A) were selected for a serial follow-up study while 42 served as controls (group B). Forty-two group A patients took part in a 1.5-year examination while 47 (26 group A, 21 group B) patients were studied at 10 years.
RESULTS: Groups A and B were comparable as regards all pre- and intra-operative data including left ventricular mass index (LVMi). A previously developed preoperative prognostic index (PI) separated the patients into groups with low (n=23), intermediary (n=19) and high risk (n=49) with 10-year survivals of 87%, 58% and 43% (P<0.01). LVMi dropped from 202+/-58g/m(2)preoperatively to 152+/-45g/m(2)(P<0.0001) at 1.5 years, and 139+/-40g/m(2)(P<0.0001) at 10 years (three and six patients, respectively, with paravalvular leak or mitral regurgitation excluded). PI correlated with preoperative (r=0.51, P<0.001), 1.5-year (r=0.46, P<0.01), and 10-year LVMi (r=0.41, P<0.01). Also preoperative left ventricular ejection fraction correlated with the three LVMi measurements. Patients with systemic hypertension had higher LVMi at 1.5 years (193+/-42, n=6 vs 144+/-42, n=33, P<0.05) and 10 years (175+/-39, n=12 vs 124+/-31g/m(2), n=29, P<0.001). Patients with low, intermediary or high PI, excluding those with hypertension, had 1.5-year LVMi of 110+/-35 (n=8), 134+/-43 (n=9) and 164+/-33g/m(2)(n=16; P<0.01), respectively, and 10-year LVMi of 116+/-25 (n=17), 126+/-27 (n=6), and 146+/-41g/m(2)(n=6; P<0.05), respectively. There was no relation between LVMi at 1.5 or 10 years and peak or mean Doppler gradient, prosthetic valve size, or valve size index.
CONCLUSIONS: Left ventricular hypertrophy regression for patients who survived up to 10 years after AVR for AS is dependent on the preoperative risk profile indicating that irreversible myocardial disease is the underlying factor. Systemic hypertension is an important factor in its own right.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app