We have located links that may give you full text access.
Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 minutes: evidence from 10 years.
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2003 August
PURPOSE: The purpose was to investigate the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section and to compare the perioperative maternal and neonatal morbidity to that of intrapartum non-emergent caesarean section.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study was designed evaluating 109 women undergoing 'crash' emergency caesarean section and 109 controls from 1988 to 1997 in a University hospital. All emergency caesarean sections were performed in the delivery room. Controls were matched by gestational age. Retrospective collection of data relating to indication, maternal and neonatal outcome of both groups was conducted. Time intervals between decision to deliver and actual delivery were collected for all emergency deliveries.
RESULTS: The emergency caesarean section cohort represented a high risk group with a mean gestational age of 34.8 weeks and a high number of patients with preterm labour (29.3%). All 109 emergency caesarean sections were achieved within a decision-to-delivery time of 30 min. Severe maternal haemorrhage was significantly higher mainly because of underlying obstetrical complications such as placenta praevia, placental abruption, and others resulting in a blood transfusion rate of 10.1%. Procedure related and infectious maternal morbidity, however, was not significantly increased. All women undergoing the emergency procedure received perioperative antibioprophylaxis. Mean umbilical arterial blood pH and Apgar scores were significantly lower in infants delivered by emergency caesarean section but there was no difference in the admission to the NICU.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency caesarean section performed in the delivery room may result in a decision-to-delivery time of less than 30 min without detrimental perioperative effects on mother or infant.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort study was designed evaluating 109 women undergoing 'crash' emergency caesarean section and 109 controls from 1988 to 1997 in a University hospital. All emergency caesarean sections were performed in the delivery room. Controls were matched by gestational age. Retrospective collection of data relating to indication, maternal and neonatal outcome of both groups was conducted. Time intervals between decision to deliver and actual delivery were collected for all emergency deliveries.
RESULTS: The emergency caesarean section cohort represented a high risk group with a mean gestational age of 34.8 weeks and a high number of patients with preterm labour (29.3%). All 109 emergency caesarean sections were achieved within a decision-to-delivery time of 30 min. Severe maternal haemorrhage was significantly higher mainly because of underlying obstetrical complications such as placenta praevia, placental abruption, and others resulting in a blood transfusion rate of 10.1%. Procedure related and infectious maternal morbidity, however, was not significantly increased. All women undergoing the emergency procedure received perioperative antibioprophylaxis. Mean umbilical arterial blood pH and Apgar scores were significantly lower in infants delivered by emergency caesarean section but there was no difference in the admission to the NICU.
CONCLUSIONS: Emergency caesarean section performed in the delivery room may result in a decision-to-delivery time of less than 30 min without detrimental perioperative effects on mother or infant.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app