We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Evaluation of ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy before and after aortic valve replacement using magnetic resonance imaging.
PURPOSE: Evaluation of different electrocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy (ECG-LVH criteria) using left ventricular mass index (LVMI) determined by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In addition, the relation between LVMI regression after aortic valve replacement and corresponding ECG changes regarding LVH was studied.
METHODS: A group of 31 patients with severe aortic valve disease was studied to assess the presence of ECG-LVH and to measure LVMI and LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI); 13 patients were restudied at 9.8 +/- 2.7 months after aortic valve replacement.
RESULTS: Three criteria had a sensitivity of 100% (SV1 + RV5 or RV6 > 3.0 mV; SV1 or SV2 + RV5 > or = 3.5 mV; SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 > 3.5 mV), at the cost of specificity (50%, 44.4% and 44.4%, respectively). The R in I > 1.4 mV had a specificity of 100%, at the cost of both sensitivity and accuracy (13.6% and 54.5%, respectively). The Romhilt-Estes point score system, using > or = 4 points as cut-off value for LVH, provided the overall best accuracy of 79.5%. The number of Romhilt-Estes points also showed the best correlation with LVMI, both before and after aortic valve replacement (r = 0.81 and r = 0.67, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and correlation with LVMI were found among several ECG-LVH criteria. No single criterion performed optimally since the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and correlation with LVMI were found with different criteria. The present study may therefore contribute to a more targeted use of the existing ECG-LVH criteria.
METHODS: A group of 31 patients with severe aortic valve disease was studied to assess the presence of ECG-LVH and to measure LVMI and LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI); 13 patients were restudied at 9.8 +/- 2.7 months after aortic valve replacement.
RESULTS: Three criteria had a sensitivity of 100% (SV1 + RV5 or RV6 > 3.0 mV; SV1 or SV2 + RV5 > or = 3.5 mV; SV1 or SV2 + RV5 or RV6 > 3.5 mV), at the cost of specificity (50%, 44.4% and 44.4%, respectively). The R in I > 1.4 mV had a specificity of 100%, at the cost of both sensitivity and accuracy (13.6% and 54.5%, respectively). The Romhilt-Estes point score system, using > or = 4 points as cut-off value for LVH, provided the overall best accuracy of 79.5%. The number of Romhilt-Estes points also showed the best correlation with LVMI, both before and after aortic valve replacement (r = 0.81 and r = 0.67, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Substantial differences in sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and correlation with LVMI were found among several ECG-LVH criteria. No single criterion performed optimally since the highest sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and correlation with LVMI were found with different criteria. The present study may therefore contribute to a more targeted use of the existing ECG-LVH criteria.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app