We have located links that may give you full text access.
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
[Identification and analysis of errors in prescription, preparation and administration of drugs in intensive care, medicine and surgery at the University Hospital Center of Tours].
La Presse Médicale 2003 May 32
OBJECTIVE: Within the framework of a project to establish "the safety of drug use and the prevention of iatrogenic risks", the pharmaceutical team conducted a review on the errors in drug prescription in order to implicate the medical professionals in its development. In collaboration with the medical teams, the pharmacy organised a series of therapeutic surveys aimed at quantifying and qualifying the errors related to the prescription, preparation and administration of medicinal products.
METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted in three types of care units (Medicine, surgical intensive care and paediatric vascular surgery) over a 30-day period in each unit. A resident pharmacist studied the preparations and administration of drugs and compared them to the prescriptions and recommendations of in the literature. The investigator also conducted the pharmaceutical analysis of the prescriptions (dose, drug interactions, administration timetable...). The clinical impact of the errors on the patient were scored 0 (none) to 3 (lethal) by a duo composed of an external physician and the resident physician in charge of the study on site.
RESULTS: Among the 3,023 drugs prescribed, the error rate was of 0.04 [0.033; 0.047], 44% of which scored 2. The errors in preparation or administration were of 0.134 [0.117; 0.151] among the 1,632 drug administrations observed, 19% of which scored 2. Regarding errors in prescription and administration, no significant difference was revealed between the three units [p > 0.09].
DISCUSSION: This study enhanced the awareness of the nursing and medical staff and the hospital management with regards to the reality of medical errors. Our data were comparable to the results of other studies published elsewhere.
METHODS: A prospective survey was conducted in three types of care units (Medicine, surgical intensive care and paediatric vascular surgery) over a 30-day period in each unit. A resident pharmacist studied the preparations and administration of drugs and compared them to the prescriptions and recommendations of in the literature. The investigator also conducted the pharmaceutical analysis of the prescriptions (dose, drug interactions, administration timetable...). The clinical impact of the errors on the patient were scored 0 (none) to 3 (lethal) by a duo composed of an external physician and the resident physician in charge of the study on site.
RESULTS: Among the 3,023 drugs prescribed, the error rate was of 0.04 [0.033; 0.047], 44% of which scored 2. The errors in preparation or administration were of 0.134 [0.117; 0.151] among the 1,632 drug administrations observed, 19% of which scored 2. Regarding errors in prescription and administration, no significant difference was revealed between the three units [p > 0.09].
DISCUSSION: This study enhanced the awareness of the nursing and medical staff and the hospital management with regards to the reality of medical errors. Our data were comparable to the results of other studies published elsewhere.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app