We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Improving outpatient department efficiency: a randomized controlled trial comparing hospital and general-practice telephone reminders.
New Zealand Medical Journal 2003 June 7
AIMS: This study aimed to ascertain whether or not telephone reminders reduce non-attendance at hospital outpatient clinics and whether telephone reminders from general practitioners are more effective than those made from hospitals.
METHODS: Outpatient department appointments for three general practitioners (GPs) over a three-month period, were randomized into three groups: 'Hospital', 'GP', and 'Control'. Patients in the Hospital and the GP groups were reminded of their appointment by telephone 24 hours beforehand, by a hospital waiting-list clerk or their general practitioner respectively. Information was recorded on appointment awareness and subsequent attendance history.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in the study. The three study groups had 'no show' rates of 3% (GP), 8% (Hospital), and 27% (Control). The combined 'no show' rate for the groups reminded by telephone was 5%. The combined telephone-reminded group was statistically different from the Control group (p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference between the GP group and the Hospital group (p = 0.764).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, telephone reminders significantly decreased outpatient department 'no show' rates. The source of the telephone reminder made no difference to non-attendance.
METHODS: Outpatient department appointments for three general practitioners (GPs) over a three-month period, were randomized into three groups: 'Hospital', 'GP', and 'Control'. Patients in the Hospital and the GP groups were reminded of their appointment by telephone 24 hours beforehand, by a hospital waiting-list clerk or their general practitioner respectively. Information was recorded on appointment awareness and subsequent attendance history.
RESULTS: A total of 109 patients were included in the study. The three study groups had 'no show' rates of 3% (GP), 8% (Hospital), and 27% (Control). The combined 'no show' rate for the groups reminded by telephone was 5%. The combined telephone-reminded group was statistically different from the Control group (p = 0.004). There was no statistical difference between the GP group and the Hospital group (p = 0.764).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, telephone reminders significantly decreased outpatient department 'no show' rates. The source of the telephone reminder made no difference to non-attendance.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Sarcoidosis: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation 2024 April 19
Essential thrombocythaemia: A contemporary approach with new drugs on the horizon.British Journal of Haematology 2024 April 9
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app