EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical outcomes and changes in venous hemodynamics after subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery.

Surgical Endoscopy 2003 August
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the clinical results of subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery (SEPS) in patients with severe chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) (clinical class 4-6) and assessed the hemodynamic changes associated with SEPS using air plethysmography (APG).

METHODS: Forty-five patients with severe CVI who had undergone SEPS were evaluated. Clinical score and venous hemodynamics, as measured by APG before operation and at 1 month and 1 year after operation, were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Patient satisfaction (on a visual analogue scale of 0 to 100%) was also assessed.

RESULTS: There were 29 men and 16 women; their mean age was 60 years (range, 37-83). Thirty-five patients (78%) had active venous ulcers; the ulcers' mean size was 7.8 +/- 11.9 cm2 and the mean duration of ulceration was 9 +/- 10 months. There were no hospital deaths. Postoperative complications were uncommon (one groin wound infection and one case of thrombophlebitis). At a mean follow-up of 15 +/- 9 months, 34 ulcers (97%) had healed. The cumulative ulcer healing was 82% at 3 months. There were five recurrent ulcers (15%). Significant improvement was seen in the clinical scores (10 +/- 3 before operation, 6 +/- 4 at 1 month, and 4 +/- 3 at 1 year after operation). The venous filling index was also significantly improved after operation; this improvement was maintained at 1-year follow-up (7.36 +/- 6.23 ml/sec before operation, 3.63 +/- 3.90 ml/sec at 1 month, and 3.14 +/- 2.06 ml/sec at 1 year). The degree of patient satisfaction was also remarkable, with 74 +/- 17% and 90 +/- 12% satisfaction at 1-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: SEPS is a safe and effective treatment for patients with severe CVI. It leads to hemodynamic improvement, with rapid ulcer healing, and it is associated with a high degree of patient satisfaction.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app