Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Communication skill of general practitioners: any room for improvement? How much can it be improved?

OBJECTIVE: To measure any changes in the communication skills of primary care physicians before and after a part-time Diploma course in Family Medicine.

SUBJECTS: 79 Hong Kong Chinese doctors (46 of whom were local graduates, with an average of 7 years in general practice).

METHODS: Over the 10-month course in 2000-01, participants had 11 2.5-hour lecture/demonstrations in communication skills, 2 sessions of role play practice in groups of 20, self-analysis of a videotaped interview and skills evaluation. A before-after design measured scores in videotaped simulated patient interviews (rated by a research assistant using a structured observation guide, after standardisation by a psychologist) and scores in Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE) (rated by experienced family physician examiners with standardised checklists).

RESULTS: There were wide variations in baseline skills, with scores ranging between 24-78 (out of 100) for video and 18-68 for OSCE, which were related to prior training and inversely associated with years after graduation. Significant improvements occurred in both video (from 53 to 61) and OSCE (from 46 to 56) post-course (P < 0.001). The group in the lowest quartile improved from 36 to 54 for video and from 29 to 48 for OSCE, while those in the second lowest quartile improved from 50 to 61 for video and from 44 to 56 for OSCE (F = 12.2, P < 0.001). Doctors who graduated more than 20 years ago made as much improvement as more recent graduates.

CONCLUSIONS: Communication skills can be effectively taught to, and improved among experienced Chinese doctors by a combination of large-class teaching and medium-sized group practice with feedback, and without intensive individual supervision.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app