We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
MULTICENTER STUDY
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
The efficacy and safety of oral sildenafil in Thai men with erectile dysfunction: a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, flexible-dose study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sildenafil citrate (Viagra) in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, flexible-dose study in Thai men with erectile dysfunction of broad-spectrum etiology and more than 6 months' duration.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: 125 patients aged 26 to 77 years were randomized at 4 centers in Thailand to receive either sildenafil citrate (50 mg initially, increased if necessary up to 100 mg or decreased to 25 mg depending on efficacy and/or tolerability) (n = 63) or a matching placebo (n = 62) taken on an 'as needed' basis approximately 1 hour prior to anticipated sexual activity for a period of 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the patients' responses to the 15-question International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), to questions on the event log of sexual activity, and to the global efficacy assessment question concerning improvement in erections.
RESULTS: At the conclusion of the study, both the primary efficacy variables relating to the achievement and maintenance of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and the secondary efficacy variables, which included the 5 separate domains of sexual functioning of the IIEF, the percentage of successful attempts at sexual intercourse, and the global efficacy assessment question concerning improvement in erections, were all significantly improved statistically by sildenafil in comparison with placebo except in the sexual desire domain which showed no difference. The percentage of successful attempts at sexual intercourse in the sildenafil group was 66.16 per cent while in the placebo group it was 33.05 per cent. The percentage of global efficacy assessment was improved in the sildenafil group by 82.5 per cent compared to 36.1 per cent in the placebo group. Adverse events considered treatment-related occurred in 19 patients (30.2%) receiving sildenafil and 7 (11.3%) receiving placebo. The most common adverse events with sildenafil were vasodilatation (flushing), headache, and dizziness, which occurred in 14.3 per cent, 6.3 per cent, and 6.3 per cent of patients respectively. All events were mild in nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and effective treatment for erectile dysfunction of broad-spectrum etiology in Thai men. Its efficacy appears similar to that reported in other studies in Western populations.
MATERIAL AND METHOD: 125 patients aged 26 to 77 years were randomized at 4 centers in Thailand to receive either sildenafil citrate (50 mg initially, increased if necessary up to 100 mg or decreased to 25 mg depending on efficacy and/or tolerability) (n = 63) or a matching placebo (n = 62) taken on an 'as needed' basis approximately 1 hour prior to anticipated sexual activity for a period of 12 weeks. Efficacy was assessed by the patients' responses to the 15-question International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), to questions on the event log of sexual activity, and to the global efficacy assessment question concerning improvement in erections.
RESULTS: At the conclusion of the study, both the primary efficacy variables relating to the achievement and maintenance of erections sufficient for sexual intercourse and the secondary efficacy variables, which included the 5 separate domains of sexual functioning of the IIEF, the percentage of successful attempts at sexual intercourse, and the global efficacy assessment question concerning improvement in erections, were all significantly improved statistically by sildenafil in comparison with placebo except in the sexual desire domain which showed no difference. The percentage of successful attempts at sexual intercourse in the sildenafil group was 66.16 per cent while in the placebo group it was 33.05 per cent. The percentage of global efficacy assessment was improved in the sildenafil group by 82.5 per cent compared to 36.1 per cent in the placebo group. Adverse events considered treatment-related occurred in 19 patients (30.2%) receiving sildenafil and 7 (11.3%) receiving placebo. The most common adverse events with sildenafil were vasodilatation (flushing), headache, and dizziness, which occurred in 14.3 per cent, 6.3 per cent, and 6.3 per cent of patients respectively. All events were mild in nature.
CONCLUSIONS: Sildenafil is a safe and effective treatment for erectile dysfunction of broad-spectrum etiology in Thai men. Its efficacy appears similar to that reported in other studies in Western populations.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app