We have located links that may give you full text access.
Delivery of singleton preterm infants in New South Wales, 1990-1997.
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2003 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in the maternal characteristics and delivery of singleton preterm infants in an Australian population.
DESIGN: Population-based descriptive study.
SETTING: New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
POPULATION: The population included 37 500 singleton preterm births from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 1997.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the NSW Midwives' Data Collection (MDC) and rates over time were calculated. Preterm birth by Caesarean section before the onset of labour or where labour was induced were considered to be medically indicated.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm rates, medically indicated preterm birth rates, mode of delivery andneonatal outcomes, and trends over time.
RESULTS: Among singleton infants, there was no significant change over time in the rate of preterm birth (annual average 5.5%), preterm births that were medically indicated (annual average 29.3%) or neonatal outcomes of preterm births. The rate of indicated preterm birth varied by gestational age and was highest (39.7%) at 29-32 weeks' gestation. Instrumental preterm births declined over time from 9.5 to 7.8% with a shift from forceps to vacuum use and episiotomy rates declined from 19.7 to 14.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Increases in the reported overall preterm rate (singletons and multiples) were not due to increased delivery of singleton infants. Changes in the management of singleton preterm births were similar to changes observed in term births such as decreasing forceps and episiotomy usage. It may be to time to reassess whether Australian clinicians would be willing to randomise patients to clinical trials of the best method of delivery for preterm infants.
DESIGN: Population-based descriptive study.
SETTING: New South Wales (NSW), Australia.
POPULATION: The population included 37 500 singleton preterm births from 1 January 1990 to 31 December 1997.
METHODS: Data were obtained from the NSW Midwives' Data Collection (MDC) and rates over time were calculated. Preterm birth by Caesarean section before the onset of labour or where labour was induced were considered to be medically indicated.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Preterm rates, medically indicated preterm birth rates, mode of delivery andneonatal outcomes, and trends over time.
RESULTS: Among singleton infants, there was no significant change over time in the rate of preterm birth (annual average 5.5%), preterm births that were medically indicated (annual average 29.3%) or neonatal outcomes of preterm births. The rate of indicated preterm birth varied by gestational age and was highest (39.7%) at 29-32 weeks' gestation. Instrumental preterm births declined over time from 9.5 to 7.8% with a shift from forceps to vacuum use and episiotomy rates declined from 19.7 to 14.8%.
CONCLUSIONS: Increases in the reported overall preterm rate (singletons and multiples) were not due to increased delivery of singleton infants. Changes in the management of singleton preterm births were similar to changes observed in term births such as decreasing forceps and episiotomy usage. It may be to time to reassess whether Australian clinicians would be willing to randomise patients to clinical trials of the best method of delivery for preterm infants.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app