We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of the Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index (PUFI), a parent- and older child-report measure that evaluates the extent of Prosthetic limb use, ease of task performance with and without the prosthesis, and its usefulness.
DESIGN: Evaluation of discriminant validity (the PUFI's ability to detect differences between children), construct validity (between the parent-report PUFI and University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function [UNB Test]), and criterion validity (comparison of parent-report PUFI responses with an assessor's scores of a child's performance of PUFI activities).
SETTING: Four pediatric amputee clinics.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight children, ages 3 to 18 years, with unilateral upper-extremity amputation and a prosthesis.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PUFI and the UNB Test.
RESULTS: The PUFI differentiated between children in high and low UNB Test score categories, and between younger and older children's functional abilities. The extent of correlation between PUFI ratings and UNB skill of performance scores was moderate for "ease of performance" and "usefulness of prosthesis" categories (r>.47, P<.05). The level of agreement between parent report and observational assessment of PUFI skills was acceptable (weighted kappa range,.44-.65).
CONCLUSIONS: The PUFI showed acceptable validity and showed promise in identifying prosthetic skill and use in children of different ages and abilities.
DESIGN: Evaluation of discriminant validity (the PUFI's ability to detect differences between children), construct validity (between the parent-report PUFI and University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function [UNB Test]), and criterion validity (comparison of parent-report PUFI responses with an assessor's scores of a child's performance of PUFI activities).
SETTING: Four pediatric amputee clinics.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight children, ages 3 to 18 years, with unilateral upper-extremity amputation and a prosthesis.
INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The PUFI and the UNB Test.
RESULTS: The PUFI differentiated between children in high and low UNB Test score categories, and between younger and older children's functional abilities. The extent of correlation between PUFI ratings and UNB skill of performance scores was moderate for "ease of performance" and "usefulness of prosthesis" categories (r>.47, P<.05). The level of agreement between parent report and observational assessment of PUFI skills was acceptable (weighted kappa range,.44-.65).
CONCLUSIONS: The PUFI showed acceptable validity and showed promise in identifying prosthetic skill and use in children of different ages and abilities.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app