We have located links that may give you full text access.
Potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of aortic dissection.
Connecticut Medicine 2003 March
STUDY OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of our study was to identify clinical issues contributing to delay in the diagnosis of nontraumatic aortic dissection.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
SETTING: A 425-bed community based, university-affiliated teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: Medical records were analyzed for physiologic, clinical, and outcome variables in 32 consecutive patients who presented to our hospital with non-traumatic aortic dissection over a three-year period (1995-1997).
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean time to diagnosis was 10.7 hours (range 0.5-72 hours). The time to diagnosis and clinical variables did not differ between type A and type B aortic dissections (8.7 vs 11.4 hours; P = 0.54). The diagnosis of aortic dissection was not entertained initially in 44% (14/32) of patients, leading to a significant delay in diagnosis compared to patients with suspected aortic dissection on admission (15.0 vs 4.5 hours; P = 0.008). Lack of a widened mediastinum on chest roentgenography (18.7 vs 6.6 hours; P = 0.026) and lack of hypertension (< 140/90 mmHg) at presentation (14.9 vs 7.1 hours; P = 0.03) were associated with a delayed diagnosis of aortic dissection as compared to presence of either finding. The presence or absence of chest or back pain, resting ECG changes, and a past medical history of hypertension did not correlate with time to diagnosis. There was a trend toward earlier diagnosis when the initial diagnostic modality was transesophageal echocardiography as compared to computed axial tomography (CAT) scan (7.7 vs 10.1 hours; P = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aortic dissection are frequently normotensive and may lack typical chest roentgenographic findings at presentation. A high index of clinical suspicion for aortic dissection is essential to avoid potentially fatal delays in its diagnosis.
DESIGN: Retrospective observational study.
SETTING: A 425-bed community based, university-affiliated teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: Medical records were analyzed for physiologic, clinical, and outcome variables in 32 consecutive patients who presented to our hospital with non-traumatic aortic dissection over a three-year period (1995-1997).
MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The mean time to diagnosis was 10.7 hours (range 0.5-72 hours). The time to diagnosis and clinical variables did not differ between type A and type B aortic dissections (8.7 vs 11.4 hours; P = 0.54). The diagnosis of aortic dissection was not entertained initially in 44% (14/32) of patients, leading to a significant delay in diagnosis compared to patients with suspected aortic dissection on admission (15.0 vs 4.5 hours; P = 0.008). Lack of a widened mediastinum on chest roentgenography (18.7 vs 6.6 hours; P = 0.026) and lack of hypertension (< 140/90 mmHg) at presentation (14.9 vs 7.1 hours; P = 0.03) were associated with a delayed diagnosis of aortic dissection as compared to presence of either finding. The presence or absence of chest or back pain, resting ECG changes, and a past medical history of hypertension did not correlate with time to diagnosis. There was a trend toward earlier diagnosis when the initial diagnostic modality was transesophageal echocardiography as compared to computed axial tomography (CAT) scan (7.7 vs 10.1 hours; P = 0.20).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with aortic dissection are frequently normotensive and may lack typical chest roentgenographic findings at presentation. A high index of clinical suspicion for aortic dissection is essential to avoid potentially fatal delays in its diagnosis.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2023 in Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 20
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app