We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Effects of direction of tendon lacerations on strength of tendon repairs.
Journal of Hand Surgery 2003 March
PURPOSE: We compared the tensile strength of different repair configurations on tendons with oblique and transverse lacerations.
METHOD: Seventy-two fresh pig flexor tendons were divided randomly and repaired using the modified Kessler, the cruciate, or the 4-strand Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) repair methods. The tendons were lacerated either transversely or obliquely. They were repaired with conventional and oblique suture repairs. The 2-mm gap formation force and ultimate strength were determined as biomechanical performance for each repair.
RESULTS: The gap formation and ultimate strength of the tendons vary with orientations of tendon lacerations and suture methods. In the tendons repaired with the modified Kessler or the cruciate methods, the 2-mm gap formation and ultimate strength of obliquely cut tendons were significantly lower than those of transversely cut tendons. The obliquely placed modified Kessler or cruciate sutures significantly improved the repair strength in the tendons with an oblique laceration. In the tendons repaired with the MGH method, no statistical differences were found in the repair strength of obliquely and transversely lacerated tendons.
CONCLUSIONS: The direction of tendon lacerations affects strength of certain repair configurations. The nonlocking modified Kessler or the cruciate tendon repairs are weakened considerably when the tendon laceration is oblique but their mechanical performance is strengthened by re-orienting the repair strands to lie parallel to the laceration. The cross-locked configuration of the MGH repair is not affected by the obliquity of the tendon laceration.
METHOD: Seventy-two fresh pig flexor tendons were divided randomly and repaired using the modified Kessler, the cruciate, or the 4-strand Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) repair methods. The tendons were lacerated either transversely or obliquely. They were repaired with conventional and oblique suture repairs. The 2-mm gap formation force and ultimate strength were determined as biomechanical performance for each repair.
RESULTS: The gap formation and ultimate strength of the tendons vary with orientations of tendon lacerations and suture methods. In the tendons repaired with the modified Kessler or the cruciate methods, the 2-mm gap formation and ultimate strength of obliquely cut tendons were significantly lower than those of transversely cut tendons. The obliquely placed modified Kessler or cruciate sutures significantly improved the repair strength in the tendons with an oblique laceration. In the tendons repaired with the MGH method, no statistical differences were found in the repair strength of obliquely and transversely lacerated tendons.
CONCLUSIONS: The direction of tendon lacerations affects strength of certain repair configurations. The nonlocking modified Kessler or the cruciate tendon repairs are weakened considerably when the tendon laceration is oblique but their mechanical performance is strengthened by re-orienting the repair strands to lie parallel to the laceration. The cross-locked configuration of the MGH repair is not affected by the obliquity of the tendon laceration.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
The Effect of Albumin Administration in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Single-Center Analysis.Critical Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 8
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app