We have located links that may give you full text access.
Clinical Trial
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
A split-mouth comparison of a three-dimensional-action electric toothbrush and a high-frequency electric toothbrush for reducing plaque and gingivitis.
PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness in reducing plaque and gingivitis of an electric toothbrush with three-dimensional (oscillating/rotating/pulsating) brush head action, Braun Oral-B 3D Plaque Remover, and an electric toothbrush with high-frequency vibrating action, Sonicare Plus.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomised, split-mouth study of 33 adult subjects who used both electric toothbrushes for a total of 9 weeks. After a 2-week acclimation period of brushing with each device on alternating days, subjects received a prophylaxis, then refrained from any oral hygiene on the mandibular teeth for 21 days to induce gingivitis. However, they continued to brush the maxillary teeth on alternating days with each electric toothbrush. Then, for a period of 4 weeks they brushed each side of the mouth with different toothbrushes, randomly assigned to right or left. Plaque and gingivitis were assessed initially, after the 21-day no-oral-hygiene period, and after 2, 3 and 4 weeks of brushing twice daily.
RESULTS: After 21 days without oral hygiene, mean mandibular plaque and gingivitis scores increased significantly for all subjects. Use of both electric toothbrushes during the treatment phase progressively reduced plaque and gingivitis scores at each successive examination. The Braun toothbrush was significantly more effective than the Sonicare toothbrush in reducing plaque at every examination and gingival bleeding after 4 weeks of brushing. It is concluded that the Braun electric toothbrush with three-dimensional brush head action offers advantages over the Sonicare electric toothbrush with high-frequency vibrating action in terms of plaque control and potential improvement of gingival health following induction of experimental gingivitis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomised, split-mouth study of 33 adult subjects who used both electric toothbrushes for a total of 9 weeks. After a 2-week acclimation period of brushing with each device on alternating days, subjects received a prophylaxis, then refrained from any oral hygiene on the mandibular teeth for 21 days to induce gingivitis. However, they continued to brush the maxillary teeth on alternating days with each electric toothbrush. Then, for a period of 4 weeks they brushed each side of the mouth with different toothbrushes, randomly assigned to right or left. Plaque and gingivitis were assessed initially, after the 21-day no-oral-hygiene period, and after 2, 3 and 4 weeks of brushing twice daily.
RESULTS: After 21 days without oral hygiene, mean mandibular plaque and gingivitis scores increased significantly for all subjects. Use of both electric toothbrushes during the treatment phase progressively reduced plaque and gingivitis scores at each successive examination. The Braun toothbrush was significantly more effective than the Sonicare toothbrush in reducing plaque at every examination and gingival bleeding after 4 weeks of brushing. It is concluded that the Braun electric toothbrush with three-dimensional brush head action offers advantages over the Sonicare electric toothbrush with high-frequency vibrating action in terms of plaque control and potential improvement of gingival health following induction of experimental gingivitis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app