JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Outcome and patterns of failure in pathologic stages I-IV clear-cell carcinoma of the endometrium: implications for adjuvant radiation therapy.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome and patterns of failure in women with uterine clear-cell carcinoma and discuss implications for adjuvant radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS: Between 1980 and 2000, 686 endometrial carcinoma patients underwent primary surgery at our institution. Thirty-eight women (5.5%) had clear-cell tumors (18 clear-cell only, 8 clear-cell + adenocarcinoma, and 12 clear-cell + other unfavorable histologies [10 papillary serous, 1 uterine sarcoma, 1 both]). All underwent surgery and assessment of peritoneal cytology. None received preoperative RT. Pelvic and para-aortic node samplings were performed in 26 and 17 patients, respectively. FIGO stages were as follows: 3 IA, 4 IB, 5 IC, 4 IIA, 6 IIB, 8 IIIA, 2 IIIB, 3 IIIC, and 6 IV. Adjuvant therapies included the following: 5 none, 22 RT (13 pelvic RT, 2 vaginal brachytherapy, 7 both), 11 chemotherapy (8 alone, 3 after pelvic RT), and 3 hormones. No patient received whole-abdominal RT or para-aortic RT. Median follow-up was 36.5 months.

RESULTS: The 5-year actuarial disease-free survival of the entire group was 38.5%. No correlation was seen between relapse and stage, myometrial invasion, cytology, cervical extension, or involvement of extrauterine sites. Patients with clear +/- adenocarcinoma histology had a similar 5-year disease-free survival (38.8% vs. 38.7%, p = 0.95) compared with those with clear-cell + other unfavorable histologies. Sixteen patients relapsed (42%). Eight failed in the pelvis (5 vagina, 3 lateral pelvis). There were no pelvic failures in the group of 22 patients who received adjuvant RT, whereas in the group of 16 women who did not, 8 (50%) relapsed in the pelvis (p < 0.0001). Corresponding pelvic failure rates in the Stage IA-IIB patients with and without RT were 0/16 (0%) and 5/6 (83%) (p < 0.0001). Six patients (16%) failed in the para-aortic nodes and 2 (5%) in the abdomen. Only 1 (2%) patient developed an isolated abdominal failure (This patient had a mixed clear-cell/papillary serous tumor). Of the 26 women with clear-cell +/- adenocarcinoma histology, only 1 (3.8%) relapsed in the abdomen. Nine patients (24%) relapsed in distant sites, primarily the lungs and bone.

CONCLUSION: Clear-cell carcinoma comprises a small percentage of endometrial cancers, frequently presents as a mixed histology, and has a poor overall outcome. Unlike papillary serous tumors, clear-cell carcinoma does not seem to have a high propensity for abdominal failure. Our results thus do not support the routine use of whole-abdominal RT in these patients. Future protocols should focus instead on combinations of locoregional RT and chemotherapy to reduce the risk of local and systemic recurrence.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app