We have located links that may give you full text access.
Epidermal growth factor stimulation can substitute for c-Src overexpression in promoting breast carcinoma invasion.
Journal of Surgical Research 2003 Februrary
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cancer progression is in large part dependent on the complex process of cell invasion, involving adhesion, motility, and enzymatic proteolysis. Overexpression of the Src proto-oncogene (c-Src), a nonreceptor tyrosine kinase, has been implicated in the progression of both colon and breast cancer. Our group has previously reported that overexpression of c-Src leads to a significant gain in invasive cell behavior in vitro. In this study, we sought to assess the relative importance of epidermal growth factor (EGF) stimulation and c-Src overexpression in conferring an invasive phenotype.
METHODS: Breast carcinoma cells and colon epithelial cells which naturally express low levels of c-Src were used for these studies. The cells were transfected so that they overexpressed c-Src; the mock-transfected parent lines were used as controls. Transfectants were tested for changes in invasion patterns after Src inhibition and EGF stimulation.
RESULTS: Invasion assays in both cell systems confirmed the importance of c-Src in determining invasive potential. A significant correlation was shown between c-Src kinase protein and cell invasion. Furthermore, Src inhibition significantly inhibited invasion in a dose-dependent manner. To clarify the relative contribution of EGF and c-Src to cell invasion, the ability of cells to invade through growth-factor-reduced matrigel, with or without EGF added, was compared to invasion through intact matrigel. The breast and colon cell lines behave quite differently in this regard. In the colon model, overexpressed c-Src is critical for cell invasion and stimulation with EGF is synergistic with c-Src overexpression. Conversely, the breast carcinoma cells transfected with c-Src were unable to invade without EGF stimulation and did not demonstrate the same synergistic relationship between c-Src and EGF. Instead, our results indicate that in BT474 breast carcinoma cells, EGF can substitute for c-Src in promoting breast cancer cell invasion.
CONCLUSIONS: Because most breast carcinomas overexpress c-Src, it behooves one to question the extent to which reducing the amount of EGF and consequent EGFR activity will decrease invasion. In this study, the effects of EGF on cell invasion were determined in light of a single alteration in c-Src expression. Our results show that EGF enhances the impact of c-Src overexpression on invasion. In breast cancer cells, EGF is capable of inducing invasion to the same extent as c-Src overexpression. This suggests that anti-EGFR therapies will be efficacious in retarding breast carcinoma invasion and metastasis.
METHODS: Breast carcinoma cells and colon epithelial cells which naturally express low levels of c-Src were used for these studies. The cells were transfected so that they overexpressed c-Src; the mock-transfected parent lines were used as controls. Transfectants were tested for changes in invasion patterns after Src inhibition and EGF stimulation.
RESULTS: Invasion assays in both cell systems confirmed the importance of c-Src in determining invasive potential. A significant correlation was shown between c-Src kinase protein and cell invasion. Furthermore, Src inhibition significantly inhibited invasion in a dose-dependent manner. To clarify the relative contribution of EGF and c-Src to cell invasion, the ability of cells to invade through growth-factor-reduced matrigel, with or without EGF added, was compared to invasion through intact matrigel. The breast and colon cell lines behave quite differently in this regard. In the colon model, overexpressed c-Src is critical for cell invasion and stimulation with EGF is synergistic with c-Src overexpression. Conversely, the breast carcinoma cells transfected with c-Src were unable to invade without EGF stimulation and did not demonstrate the same synergistic relationship between c-Src and EGF. Instead, our results indicate that in BT474 breast carcinoma cells, EGF can substitute for c-Src in promoting breast cancer cell invasion.
CONCLUSIONS: Because most breast carcinomas overexpress c-Src, it behooves one to question the extent to which reducing the amount of EGF and consequent EGFR activity will decrease invasion. In this study, the effects of EGF on cell invasion were determined in light of a single alteration in c-Src expression. Our results show that EGF enhances the impact of c-Src overexpression on invasion. In breast cancer cells, EGF is capable of inducing invasion to the same extent as c-Src overexpression. This suggests that anti-EGFR therapies will be efficacious in retarding breast carcinoma invasion and metastasis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app