We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spinal cord in multiple sclerosis--a quantitative T1 relaxation time mapping approach.
Journal of Neurology 2003 March
BACKGROUND: The spinal cord is a common site of involvement in multiple sclerosis (MS) where pathology contributes substantially to locomotor disability. Previous studies have demonstrated significant correlations between clinical disability and cervical cord atrophy, but not with cord T(2) lesion load. We evaluate cervical cord pathology using, for the first time, quantitative T(1) relaxation time (T(1)), which shows histopathological specificity for tissue damage in the cerebral white matter.
METHOD: Cervical cord T(1) was compared in 15 MS patients [8 relapsing-remitting (RR), 7 secondary progressive (SP)] and 6 healthy controls, and related to normalised upper cervical cord area (UCCa), cerebral white matter T(1), T(2) lesion load and disability measures including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Ambulation index (AI) and timed 25-foot walk. T1 maps of the brain and cervical cord were acquired using a high-resolution, 3-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence. Dual-echo sequences were also obtained.
RESULTS: Median cervical cord T(1) [mean (standard deviation)] was significantly greater in RR [854 [28] ms] (p = 0.0006) and SP patients [927 [67] ms] (p < 0.0001) compared with controls [888 [61] ms], and in SP vs. RR patients (p = 0.002). In the overall patient cohort, it correlated significantly with median cerebral white matter T1 (r = 0.7, p = 0.0046), UCCa (r = -0.87, p < 0.0001), but not T2 lesion loads. Both median cervical cord T1 and UCCa (respectively) correlated significantly with the EDSS (r = 0.55, p = 0.03; r = -0.54, p = 0.04), AI (r = 0.77, p = 0.001; r = -0.60, p = 0.02) and timed 25-foot walk (r = 0.56, p = 0.03; r = -0.55, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Cervical cord T(1) distinguishes between MS subgroups and could also prove a useful surrogate outcome measure in MS. The relation of cervical cord T(1) to cerebral white matter T(1) suggests that cord pathology may be influenced by tissue damage upstream.
METHOD: Cervical cord T(1) was compared in 15 MS patients [8 relapsing-remitting (RR), 7 secondary progressive (SP)] and 6 healthy controls, and related to normalised upper cervical cord area (UCCa), cerebral white matter T(1), T(2) lesion load and disability measures including the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Ambulation index (AI) and timed 25-foot walk. T1 maps of the brain and cervical cord were acquired using a high-resolution, 3-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence. Dual-echo sequences were also obtained.
RESULTS: Median cervical cord T(1) [mean (standard deviation)] was significantly greater in RR [854 [28] ms] (p = 0.0006) and SP patients [927 [67] ms] (p < 0.0001) compared with controls [888 [61] ms], and in SP vs. RR patients (p = 0.002). In the overall patient cohort, it correlated significantly with median cerebral white matter T1 (r = 0.7, p = 0.0046), UCCa (r = -0.87, p < 0.0001), but not T2 lesion loads. Both median cervical cord T1 and UCCa (respectively) correlated significantly with the EDSS (r = 0.55, p = 0.03; r = -0.54, p = 0.04), AI (r = 0.77, p = 0.001; r = -0.60, p = 0.02) and timed 25-foot walk (r = 0.56, p = 0.03; r = -0.55, p = 0.04).
CONCLUSION: Cervical cord T(1) distinguishes between MS subgroups and could also prove a useful surrogate outcome measure in MS. The relation of cervical cord T(1) to cerebral white matter T(1) suggests that cord pathology may be influenced by tissue damage upstream.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app