We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Intracytoplasmic sperm injection with testicular spermatozoa is less successful in men with nonobstructive azoospermia than in men with obstructive azoospermia.
Fertility and Sterility 2003 March
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficiency of intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) using testicular spermatozoa in cases of nonobstructive azoospermia.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Tertiary university-based infertility center.
PATIENT(S): Overall, 595 couples were included. In 360 couples, the man had normal spermatogenesis. In 118, 85, and 32 couples the man had germ-cell aplasia, maturation arrest, and tubular sclerosis/atrophy, all with focal spermatogenesis present.
INTERVENTION(S): We performed 911 ICSI cycles using fresh sperm obtained after testicular biopsies: 306 ICSI cycles used testicular sperm from men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and 605 ICSI cycles used testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, cleavage, implantation, and pregnancy rates.
RESULT(S): Overall, the 2PN fertilization rate was lower in the nonobstructive group: 48.5% vs. 59.7%. There were no differences in in vitro development or in the morphological quality of the embryos. In the nonobstructive group, a total of 718 embryos were transferred (262 transfers) vs. 1,525 embryos in the obstructive group (544 transfers). Both the clinical implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle were significantly lower in the nonobstructive group compared with the obstructive group: 8.6% vs. 12.5% and 15.4% vs. 24.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION(S): A statistically significant lower rate of fertilization and pregnancy results from ICSI with testicular sperm from men with nonobstructive azoospermia, compared with men with obstructive azoospermia.
DESIGN: Retrospective case series.
SETTING: Tertiary university-based infertility center.
PATIENT(S): Overall, 595 couples were included. In 360 couples, the man had normal spermatogenesis. In 118, 85, and 32 couples the man had germ-cell aplasia, maturation arrest, and tubular sclerosis/atrophy, all with focal spermatogenesis present.
INTERVENTION(S): We performed 911 ICSI cycles using fresh sperm obtained after testicular biopsies: 306 ICSI cycles used testicular sperm from men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and 605 ICSI cycles used testicular sperm from men with obstructive azoospermia.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization, cleavage, implantation, and pregnancy rates.
RESULT(S): Overall, the 2PN fertilization rate was lower in the nonobstructive group: 48.5% vs. 59.7%. There were no differences in in vitro development or in the morphological quality of the embryos. In the nonobstructive group, a total of 718 embryos were transferred (262 transfers) vs. 1,525 embryos in the obstructive group (544 transfers). Both the clinical implantation rate and clinical pregnancy rate per cycle were significantly lower in the nonobstructive group compared with the obstructive group: 8.6% vs. 12.5% and 15.4% vs. 24.0%, respectively.
CONCLUSION(S): A statistically significant lower rate of fertilization and pregnancy results from ICSI with testicular sperm from men with nonobstructive azoospermia, compared with men with obstructive azoospermia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app