We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
The effect of indocyanine-green on functional outcome of macular pucker surgery.
American Journal of Ophthalmology 2003 March
PURPOSE: To compare functional results after surgery for macular pucker either with or without indocyanine-green staining of the internal limiting membrane (ILM) and to evaluate the ultrastructure of the tissue removed.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of two successive, consecutive, interventional case series.
METHODS: Functional outcome (visual acuity, Goldmann perimetry) of 48 eyes of 48 consecutive patients with (group 1, n = 20) or without (group 2, n = 28) intraoperative use of indocyanine-green (ICG) was retrospectively analyzed. For statistical analysis, best-corrected visual acuity measured at the last presentation was considered. Only patients with an idiopathic macular pucker were included. Surgery consisted of three-port pars plana vitrectomy, and removal of epiretinal tissue and the ILM in a second step. Commercially available ICG with a concentration of.05% and an osmolarity of 275 mOsm was used to stain the ILM. The surgical technique used for both groups was identical, except the use of ICG. Epiretinal tissue of all eyes was harvested and prepared for ultrastructural analysis using light and electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Follow-up time was 8.5 months in group 1 and 5.4 months in group 2. Whereas patients operated on without ICG experienced a significant improvement of median best-corrected visual acuity from 20/63 (range, 20/400 to 20/32) preoperatively to 20/40 (range, 20/200 to 20/25) postoperatively (P < .001), median best-corrected visual acuity remained 20/63 before (range, 20/200 to 20/63) and after (range, 20/400 to 20/20) (P > .9) ICG-assisted peeling. There was a statistically significant difference (P = .013) in best-corrected postoperative visual acuity of patients with and without the use of ICG. An improvement of vision was noted in 86% of patients without and 55% of patients with ICG-assisted surgery. Thirty-five percent of patients after ICG application presented with a deterioration of visual acuity. Furthermore, we observed large visual field defects in 7 of 20 patients after ILM staining. No visual field defects were noted after conventional peeling. Histologic analysis revealed clear differences between the two groups concerning the amount of cellular elements adjacent to the retinal surface of the ILM: There was more cellular debris visible in specimens after ICG application during surgery. Additionally, in contrast to surgery without ILM staining, epiretinal cells had ruptured and lost their cellular integrity after ICG-assisted vitrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Indocyanine green-assisted surgery for macular pucker might have an adverse effect on functional outcome. Although there were obvious differences in the ultrastructure of tissue removed during surgery, our observations cannot be explained by histologic analysis alone. Other, so far unknown mechanisms of action must be considered.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of two successive, consecutive, interventional case series.
METHODS: Functional outcome (visual acuity, Goldmann perimetry) of 48 eyes of 48 consecutive patients with (group 1, n = 20) or without (group 2, n = 28) intraoperative use of indocyanine-green (ICG) was retrospectively analyzed. For statistical analysis, best-corrected visual acuity measured at the last presentation was considered. Only patients with an idiopathic macular pucker were included. Surgery consisted of three-port pars plana vitrectomy, and removal of epiretinal tissue and the ILM in a second step. Commercially available ICG with a concentration of.05% and an osmolarity of 275 mOsm was used to stain the ILM. The surgical technique used for both groups was identical, except the use of ICG. Epiretinal tissue of all eyes was harvested and prepared for ultrastructural analysis using light and electron microscopy.
RESULTS: Follow-up time was 8.5 months in group 1 and 5.4 months in group 2. Whereas patients operated on without ICG experienced a significant improvement of median best-corrected visual acuity from 20/63 (range, 20/400 to 20/32) preoperatively to 20/40 (range, 20/200 to 20/25) postoperatively (P < .001), median best-corrected visual acuity remained 20/63 before (range, 20/200 to 20/63) and after (range, 20/400 to 20/20) (P > .9) ICG-assisted peeling. There was a statistically significant difference (P = .013) in best-corrected postoperative visual acuity of patients with and without the use of ICG. An improvement of vision was noted in 86% of patients without and 55% of patients with ICG-assisted surgery. Thirty-five percent of patients after ICG application presented with a deterioration of visual acuity. Furthermore, we observed large visual field defects in 7 of 20 patients after ILM staining. No visual field defects were noted after conventional peeling. Histologic analysis revealed clear differences between the two groups concerning the amount of cellular elements adjacent to the retinal surface of the ILM: There was more cellular debris visible in specimens after ICG application during surgery. Additionally, in contrast to surgery without ILM staining, epiretinal cells had ruptured and lost their cellular integrity after ICG-assisted vitrectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Indocyanine green-assisted surgery for macular pucker might have an adverse effect on functional outcome. Although there were obvious differences in the ultrastructure of tissue removed during surgery, our observations cannot be explained by histologic analysis alone. Other, so far unknown mechanisms of action must be considered.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: 2025 Update on the Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Therapy.American Journal of Hematology 2025 January 28
Hepatic encephalopathy - when lactulose and rifaximin are not working.Gastroenterology 2025 January 24
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2025 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app