We have located links that may give you full text access.
CLINICAL TRIAL
COMPARATIVE STUDY
ENGLISH ABSTRACT
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
[The effect of losartan versus atenolol on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension and ECG-verified left ventricular hypertrophy in the LIFE-study].
Ugeskrift for Laeger 2003 January 28
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular hypertrophy is a strong independent predictor of risk of cardiovascular morbidity and death. The aim of the LIFE-study was to establish whether treatment with the angiotensin-II AT 1-receptor antagonist, losartan, reduced cardiovascular events more effectively than treatment with the betablocker atenolol in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The LIFE-study included 9193 patients with essential hypertension and ECG-verified left ventricular hypertrophy, age range 55-80 years, systolic blood pressure in sitting position 160-200 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 95-115 mmHg. Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with losartan versus atenolol. They were followed for at least four years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke).
RESULTS: Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 and 29.1/16.8 mmHg in the losartan and the atenolol group, respectively. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan and 588 atenolol patients (relative risk 0.87, p = 0.021). A total of 232 and 309, respectively, had fatal or non-fatal stroke (relative risk 0.75, p = 0.001). There was no difference in myocardial infarction. New-onset diabetes was 25% less frequent on losartan. Side effects were less on losartan compared to atenolol.
DISCUSSION: Losartan prevents to a higher degree cardiovascular morbidity and death than atenolol for a similar reduction in blood pressure and is better tolerated.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The LIFE-study included 9193 patients with essential hypertension and ECG-verified left ventricular hypertrophy, age range 55-80 years, systolic blood pressure in sitting position 160-200 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure 95-115 mmHg. Patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with losartan versus atenolol. They were followed for at least four years and until 1040 patients had a primary cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction or stroke).
RESULTS: Blood pressure fell by 30.2/16.6 and 29.1/16.8 mmHg in the losartan and the atenolol group, respectively. The primary composite endpoint occurred in 508 losartan and 588 atenolol patients (relative risk 0.87, p = 0.021). A total of 232 and 309, respectively, had fatal or non-fatal stroke (relative risk 0.75, p = 0.001). There was no difference in myocardial infarction. New-onset diabetes was 25% less frequent on losartan. Side effects were less on losartan compared to atenolol.
DISCUSSION: Losartan prevents to a higher degree cardiovascular morbidity and death than atenolol for a similar reduction in blood pressure and is better tolerated.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app