We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Hearing levels in infants and young children in relation to testing technique, age group, and the presence or absence of middle-ear effusion.
Ear and Hearing 2003 Februrary
OBJECTIVE: As part of a prospective study of possible effects of early-life otitis media on speech, language, cognition, and psychosocial development, we evaluated hearing both during episodes of middle-ear effusion (MEE) and when MEE was not present. The objective of this report is to describe age-specific hearing threshold levels in relation to the presence or absence of MEE in a large sample of young children.
DESIGN: Participants were 1,055 children drawn from a sample of 6,350 children who were enrolled in the larger study by 2 mo of age. Otologic evaluation of each child was conducted at least monthly. The protocol of the larger study called for hearing evaluations 1) after 8 wk of continuous unilateral or bilateral MEE and every 4 wk thereafter until one test had been conducted when MEE was no longer present; 2) immediately before developmental testing; and 3) in a sample of children without MEE to obtain age-specific normative data.
RESULTS: Results are presented by testing technique, age group, and middle-ear condition. In general, hearing threshold levels were highest in the youngest children tested with visual reinforcement audiometry and lowest in the oldest children tested with conventional audiometry. In general also, thresholds were lowest in children with normal middle-ear status, intermediate in children with unilateral MEE, and highest in children with bilateral MEE. On average, the presence of bilateral MEE was associated with hearing threshold levels 10 to 15 dB higher than the normative values for the corresponding age group.
CONCLUSIONS: In infants and young children, audiometric results are influenced by testing technique, age group, and the presence or absence of effusion in each ear.
DESIGN: Participants were 1,055 children drawn from a sample of 6,350 children who were enrolled in the larger study by 2 mo of age. Otologic evaluation of each child was conducted at least monthly. The protocol of the larger study called for hearing evaluations 1) after 8 wk of continuous unilateral or bilateral MEE and every 4 wk thereafter until one test had been conducted when MEE was no longer present; 2) immediately before developmental testing; and 3) in a sample of children without MEE to obtain age-specific normative data.
RESULTS: Results are presented by testing technique, age group, and middle-ear condition. In general, hearing threshold levels were highest in the youngest children tested with visual reinforcement audiometry and lowest in the oldest children tested with conventional audiometry. In general also, thresholds were lowest in children with normal middle-ear status, intermediate in children with unilateral MEE, and highest in children with bilateral MEE. On average, the presence of bilateral MEE was associated with hearing threshold levels 10 to 15 dB higher than the normative values for the corresponding age group.
CONCLUSIONS: In infants and young children, audiometric results are influenced by testing technique, age group, and the presence or absence of effusion in each ear.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app