JOURNAL ARTICLE
Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review.
Intensive Care Medicine 2003 Februrary
OBJECTIVES: To characterise discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in patients who die in the intensive care unit.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Ten-bed closed mixed adult intensive care unit in a tertiary referral teaching hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: All the clinical notes and autopsy reports of 346 patients who died in the intensive care unit in 1996-2000.
INTERVENTIONS: Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were reviewed by two intensivists, a specialist in infectious diseases, a pathologist and an anaesthesiologist. New findings which would have changed current therapy in the intensive care unit were categorised as a Class I discrepancy, and those related to death but which would not have altered therapy as a Class II discrepancy.
RESULTS: Of 2370 patients admitted, 388 (16.4%) died. An autopsy was performed in 346 (89%) of the deceased patients. A Class I discrepancy was found in 8 patients (2.3%) and a Class II discrepancy in 11 patients (3.2%). Five of the eight (62%) Class I discrepancies were infections which occurred in patients already treated for another infections.
CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of advanced diagnostic facilities, especially infectious complications seem to remain undiagnosed. Autopsy is a valuable tool with which to monitor diagnostic accuracy in these patients.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review.
SETTING: Ten-bed closed mixed adult intensive care unit in a tertiary referral teaching hospital.
PARTICIPANTS: All the clinical notes and autopsy reports of 346 patients who died in the intensive care unit in 1996-2000.
INTERVENTIONS: Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses were reviewed by two intensivists, a specialist in infectious diseases, a pathologist and an anaesthesiologist. New findings which would have changed current therapy in the intensive care unit were categorised as a Class I discrepancy, and those related to death but which would not have altered therapy as a Class II discrepancy.
RESULTS: Of 2370 patients admitted, 388 (16.4%) died. An autopsy was performed in 346 (89%) of the deceased patients. A Class I discrepancy was found in 8 patients (2.3%) and a Class II discrepancy in 11 patients (3.2%). Five of the eight (62%) Class I discrepancies were infections which occurred in patients already treated for another infections.
CONCLUSION: Despite the availability of advanced diagnostic facilities, especially infectious complications seem to remain undiagnosed. Autopsy is a valuable tool with which to monitor diagnostic accuracy in these patients.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Diabetic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes: a consensus statement from the Swiss Societies of Diabetes and Nephrology.Swiss Medical Weekly 2023 January 7
Systemic complications of rheumatoid arthritis: Focus on pathogenesis and treatment.Frontiers in Immunology 2022
Migraine.Annals of Internal Medicine 2023 January 11
Long COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations.Nature Reviews. Microbiology 2023 January 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app