We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Chest pain in hospitalized patients: cause-specific and gender-specific differences.
Journal of Women's Health 2002 October
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective cardiological-linguistic study was to assess cause-specific and gender-specific differences in the reported symptoms and description of chest pain.
METHODS: In patients hospitalized because of chest pain, location, radiation, quality of chest pain, pain precipitating and relieving factors, and additional symptoms were assessed. The cause of chest pain was assessed as either coronary or noncoronary. Patients' pain descriptions were taped for linguistic narrative analysis and transcribed according to ethnomethodological standards.
RESULTS: The cause of chest pain was assessed as coronary in 43 (18 females, 25 males, mean age 63 years) and noncoronary in 49 (30 females, 19 males, mean age 62 years) patients. Only few cause-related differences in the symptoms were found. In patients with a coronary cause, the location of chest pain was more often retrosternal (93% vs. 71%, p = 0.0078), in the right arm (23% vs. 6%, p = 0.0186), and less often in the back (28% vs. 51%, p = 0.0241) than in patients with a noncoronary cause of chest pain. Coronary patients more often had a pressing pain quality (81% vs. 61%, p = 0.034), less often pain precipitated by respiration (16% vs. 45%, p = 0.0032), and vertigo (21% vs. 43%, p = 0.0252) than noncoronary patients. The women were older than the men (mean age 65.6 vs. 59.0 years, p = 0.01). Women with a coronary cause more often had a gradual pain onset (78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0488) and relief by rest (78% vs. 40%, p = 0.0139) than men with a coronary cause. Linguistic analysis revealed that men presented themselves as interested in the cause of the chest pain, observing and describing pain concretely, whereas women presented themselves as prevailingly pain enduring, describing their pain diffusely.
CONCLUSIONS: Cause-related and gender-related differences in symptoms are too unspecific to distinguish between coronary and noncoronary causes. The strong gender differences in self-presentation and description of chest pain might be an explanation for underdiagnosis and undertreatment of women with coronary heart disease and should be considered when taking the clinical history of a female patient.
METHODS: In patients hospitalized because of chest pain, location, radiation, quality of chest pain, pain precipitating and relieving factors, and additional symptoms were assessed. The cause of chest pain was assessed as either coronary or noncoronary. Patients' pain descriptions were taped for linguistic narrative analysis and transcribed according to ethnomethodological standards.
RESULTS: The cause of chest pain was assessed as coronary in 43 (18 females, 25 males, mean age 63 years) and noncoronary in 49 (30 females, 19 males, mean age 62 years) patients. Only few cause-related differences in the symptoms were found. In patients with a coronary cause, the location of chest pain was more often retrosternal (93% vs. 71%, p = 0.0078), in the right arm (23% vs. 6%, p = 0.0186), and less often in the back (28% vs. 51%, p = 0.0241) than in patients with a noncoronary cause of chest pain. Coronary patients more often had a pressing pain quality (81% vs. 61%, p = 0.034), less often pain precipitated by respiration (16% vs. 45%, p = 0.0032), and vertigo (21% vs. 43%, p = 0.0252) than noncoronary patients. The women were older than the men (mean age 65.6 vs. 59.0 years, p = 0.01). Women with a coronary cause more often had a gradual pain onset (78% vs. 48%, p = 0.0488) and relief by rest (78% vs. 40%, p = 0.0139) than men with a coronary cause. Linguistic analysis revealed that men presented themselves as interested in the cause of the chest pain, observing and describing pain concretely, whereas women presented themselves as prevailingly pain enduring, describing their pain diffusely.
CONCLUSIONS: Cause-related and gender-related differences in symptoms are too unspecific to distinguish between coronary and noncoronary causes. The strong gender differences in self-presentation and description of chest pain might be an explanation for underdiagnosis and undertreatment of women with coronary heart disease and should be considered when taking the clinical history of a female patient.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app