COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE

Exercise training without ventricular remodeling in patients with moderate to severe left ventricular dysfunction early after acute myocardial infarction

Yoritaka Otsuka, Hiroshi Takaki, Yoshiaki Okano, Toru Satoh, Naohiko Aihara, Takahiro Matsumoto, Yoshio Yasumura, Isao Morii, Yoichi Goto
International Journal of Cardiology 2003, 87 (2): 237-44
12559545

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not patients with moderate to severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction benefit from exercise training starting early after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) without deteriorating LV remodeling.

METHODS: We investigated changes in exercise capacity and LV end-diastolic dimension (LVDd by two-dimensional echocardiography) before and after exercise training in 126 patients after AMI. Patients were divided into three groups according to LV ejection fraction (EF) at the beginning of exercise training: 74 patients with LVEF>/=45% (Group H), 35 patients with 35%</=LVEF<45% (Group M), and 17 patients with LVEF<35% (Group L). Exercise training was prescribed at a moderate intensity (50-60% of heart rate reserve or Karvonen's equation). Exercise capacity was assessed by peak work rate (WR) and peak oxygen uptake (VO(2)) by upright cardiopulmonary exercise test before and after 3 months of exercise training. LVDd was measured before and at 27+/-10 months of follow-up period.

RESULTS: At the baseline, Group L had a significantly lower LVEF (H 55+/-7 vs. M 40+/-3 vs. L 30+/-3%, P<0.05), significantly greater LVDd (49+/-6 vs. 52+/-7 vs. 56+/-6 mm, P<0.05), and a higher incidence of anterior infarction (P<0.01) compared with Groups H and M, whereas there were no difference in age, sex, coronary risk factors, the incidence of multivessel disease, prior myocardial infarction, peak WR or peak VO(2) among the three groups. After 3 months of exercise training, exercise capacity increased significantly (all P<0.01) in all groups. The magnitudes of the increases in peak VO(2) (%Deltapeak VO(2): 18+/-20 vs. 15+/-19 vs. 18+/-17%, NS) and peak WR (%Deltapeak WR: 17+/-17 vs. 16+/-14 vs. 15+/-13%, NS) were similar among the three groups. In addition, there was no significant correlation between %Deltapeak VO(2) and baseline LVEF. No increase in LVDd was observed in any group at follow-up (H 48+/-5 to 49+/-4 mm vs. M 53+/-8 to 52+/-8 mm vs. L 57+/-5 to 57+/-7 mm, NS in each group).

CONCLUSION: Patients with moderate to severe LV dysfunction benefit from exercise training starting early after AMI without deteriorating LV remodeling, with a similar magnitude of improvement in exercise capacity to that in patients with mild LV dysfunction.

Full Text Links

Find Full Text Links for this Article

Discussion

You are not logged in. Sign Up or Log In to join the discussion.

Trending Papers

Remove bar
Read by QxMD icon Read
12559545
×

Save your favorite articles in one place with a free QxMD account.

×

Search Tips

Use Boolean operators: AND/OR

diabetic AND foot
diabetes OR diabetic

Exclude a word using the 'minus' sign

Virchow -triad

Use Parentheses

water AND (cup OR glass)

Add an asterisk (*) at end of a word to include word stems

Neuro* will search for Neurology, Neuroscientist, Neurological, and so on

Use quotes to search for an exact phrase

"primary prevention of cancer"
(heart or cardiac or cardio*) AND arrest -"American Heart Association"