We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
REVIEW
Quality-of-life improvement using thrombolytic therapy for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis.
Patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis suffer the most severe postthrombotic morbidity. Techniques that effectively remove thrombus from the venous system eliminate venous obstruction and potentially preserve valvular function. This will likely reduce or avoid the postthrombotic syndrome and improve long-term quality of life. To evaluate whether catheter-directed thrombolysis is associated with improved quality of life compared with anticoagulation alone and whether outcome in the thrombolysis group is related to lytic success, 98 patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis who were treated at least 6 months earlier were identified and queried with a validated health-related quality-of-life questionnaire. Sixty-eight patients were identified through the Venous Registry (a national, multicenter venous registry) and were treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis with urokinase, and 30 patients were identified by means of medical record review and were treated with anticoagulation alone. All patients were candidates for thrombolysis; however, the treatment decision was made according to physician preference. The two treatment groups did not differ significantly in average time between the reference hospitalization and first contact. No difference was found in physical functioning and well-being between the groups before the development of deep venous thrombosis. Following treatment, patients receiving catheter-directed thrombolysis reported better overall physical functioning, less stigma, less health distress, and fewer postthrombotic symptoms compared to those patients treated with anticoagulation alone. Within the thrombolysis group, successful lysis correlated with health-related quality of life. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for the management of patients with iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis significantly improves health-related quality of life compared to similar patients treated with anticoagulation alone. Improved quality of life is related to successful thrombolysis. These data offer a compelling argument for a prospective randomized study.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app