We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
The views of district nurses on their level of knowledge about the treatment of leg and foot ulcers.
Journal of Wound, Ostomy, and Continence Nursing 2003 January
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to survey the views of a sample of district nurses on their own level of knowledge about the treatment of leg and foot ulcers and what they considered to be the most important issues in wound treatment.
DESIGN: A descriptive design was used.
SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The subjects were all the nurses who treated leg and foot ulcers in the community health care service in Oslo, Norway, during autumn 1999. The subjects were selected after consultation with senior nurses.
INSTRUMENTS: A structured questionnaire with blank spaces for in-depth comments was used.
METHODS: The head of the nursing service in all 25 urban districts received a letter about the study with a questionnaire that they passed on to the nurses treating ulcers. Out of 173 eligible nurses, 102 (59%) filled in the questionnaires. Descriptive and interpretative analyses were then made.
RESULTS: Most of the participating nurses (60%) believed that their knowledge of wound treatment was insufficient. A high degree of uncertainty related to wound treatment situations was also found. The uncertainty included wound treatment, wound assessment, wound healing products, and wound causes. The main sources of the nurses' knowledge were their own nursing practice and colleagues. Twenty different factors of importance in wound treatment were reported. The most frequently mentioned factors were: wound healing, continuity in the treatment process, alleviation of pain, hygiene, compression therapy, and diagnosis. The lowest scores were awarded to documentation and economic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The nurses perceived their knowledge of leg and foot ulcer treatment to be insufficient. Their own nursing practice and colleagues were their main sources of knowledge.
DESIGN: A descriptive design was used.
SETTING AND SUBJECTS: The subjects were all the nurses who treated leg and foot ulcers in the community health care service in Oslo, Norway, during autumn 1999. The subjects were selected after consultation with senior nurses.
INSTRUMENTS: A structured questionnaire with blank spaces for in-depth comments was used.
METHODS: The head of the nursing service in all 25 urban districts received a letter about the study with a questionnaire that they passed on to the nurses treating ulcers. Out of 173 eligible nurses, 102 (59%) filled in the questionnaires. Descriptive and interpretative analyses were then made.
RESULTS: Most of the participating nurses (60%) believed that their knowledge of wound treatment was insufficient. A high degree of uncertainty related to wound treatment situations was also found. The uncertainty included wound treatment, wound assessment, wound healing products, and wound causes. The main sources of the nurses' knowledge were their own nursing practice and colleagues. Twenty different factors of importance in wound treatment were reported. The most frequently mentioned factors were: wound healing, continuity in the treatment process, alleviation of pain, hygiene, compression therapy, and diagnosis. The lowest scores were awarded to documentation and economic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: The nurses perceived their knowledge of leg and foot ulcer treatment to be insufficient. Their own nursing practice and colleagues were their main sources of knowledge.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app