We have located links that may give you full text access.
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Quality of life after treatment for gynecologic malignancies: a pilot study in an outpatient clinic.
Gynecologic Oncology 2002 November
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the health-related quality of life (QOL) of disease-free patients after therapy for gynecologic malignancies at follow-up in an outpatient clinic.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients (P) completed the general Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) QOL questionnaire at least 6 months after treatment for a gynecologic malignancy. Responses were compared to 42 unmatched healthy women (H) who were seen for standard gynecologic screening exams. Statistical evaluation was done using t tests, chi(2),and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Spearman rank correlations, and linear regression.
RESULTS: The demographic data for the groups were as follows: median age P, 59 years; H, 56 years; Caucasian P, 51%; H, 56%, African American P, 49%; H, 44%, cervix cancer (n = 51, 60%), uterine cancer (n = 24, 28%), ovarian cancer (n = 10, 12%). The median time since therapy was 39 months (range 6-149 months). There were no overall differences in FACT-G scores of patients and healthy women. Cancer survivors scored slightly higher on the emotional well-being subscale (mean 20.4 vs 19.2). Among cancer patients, all scores were lowest in patients with ovarian cancer. Longer treatment time was associated with a lower physical well-being. Older patients scored higher on emotional well-being, but lower on social/family well-being. Poor education and no help at home were associated with lower functional well-being and total FACT scores. Linear regression analysis revealed significantly lower total QOL scores in patients with the following characteristics: ovarian cancer diagnosis, treatment with radiation therapy or multi-modality therapy, less than high school education, and lack of help at home.
CONCLUSION: Overall the recovery from treatment for gynecological cancer is good. Patients with ovarian cancer, prolonged therapy, poor education, and little social support have the most significant impairments in health-related quality of life and need additional support resources.
METHODS: Eighty-five patients (P) completed the general Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) QOL questionnaire at least 6 months after treatment for a gynecologic malignancy. Responses were compared to 42 unmatched healthy women (H) who were seen for standard gynecologic screening exams. Statistical evaluation was done using t tests, chi(2),and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Spearman rank correlations, and linear regression.
RESULTS: The demographic data for the groups were as follows: median age P, 59 years; H, 56 years; Caucasian P, 51%; H, 56%, African American P, 49%; H, 44%, cervix cancer (n = 51, 60%), uterine cancer (n = 24, 28%), ovarian cancer (n = 10, 12%). The median time since therapy was 39 months (range 6-149 months). There were no overall differences in FACT-G scores of patients and healthy women. Cancer survivors scored slightly higher on the emotional well-being subscale (mean 20.4 vs 19.2). Among cancer patients, all scores were lowest in patients with ovarian cancer. Longer treatment time was associated with a lower physical well-being. Older patients scored higher on emotional well-being, but lower on social/family well-being. Poor education and no help at home were associated with lower functional well-being and total FACT scores. Linear regression analysis revealed significantly lower total QOL scores in patients with the following characteristics: ovarian cancer diagnosis, treatment with radiation therapy or multi-modality therapy, less than high school education, and lack of help at home.
CONCLUSION: Overall the recovery from treatment for gynecological cancer is good. Patients with ovarian cancer, prolonged therapy, poor education, and little social support have the most significant impairments in health-related quality of life and need additional support resources.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app