RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, P.H.S.
Robustness of empirical search strategies for clinical content in MEDLINE.
Proceedings 2002
BACKGROUND: It is important for clinical end users of MEDLINE to be able to retrieve articles that are both scientifically sound and directly relevant to clinical practice. The use of methodologic search filters (such as "random allocation" for sound studies of medical interventions) has been advocated to improve the accuracy of searching for such studies. Methodologic search filters have been tested in previous MEDLINE files but indexing continues to evolve and the operating characteristics of these search filters in current MEDLINE files are unknown.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the robustness of empirical search strategies developed in 1991 for detecting clinical content in MEDLINE in the year 2000.
DESIGN: A survey based on a hand search of 171 core health care journals using predetermined quality indicators for scientific merit and clinical relevance.
METHODS: 6 trained, experienced research assistants read all issues of 171 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was rated using purpose and quality indicators and categorized into clinically relevant original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of therapy/quality improvement, diagnosis, prognosis, causation, economics, clinical prediction, and qualitative and review articles. Search strategies developed in 1991 were tested in the 2000 database.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies.
RESULTS: Search strategies developed in 1991 generally performed at least as well in 2000 for both best single terms and combinations of terms for high-sensitivity MEDLINE searches for studies of treatment, prognosis, etiology and diagnosis. For example, the accuracy of "clinical trial (pt)" rose from 91.6% to 94.4% (P<0.05) for retrieving high-quality studies of treatments.
CONCLUSION: Most MEDLINE search strategies developed in 1991 are robust when searching in the publishing year 2000.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the robustness of empirical search strategies developed in 1991 for detecting clinical content in MEDLINE in the year 2000.
DESIGN: A survey based on a hand search of 171 core health care journals using predetermined quality indicators for scientific merit and clinical relevance.
METHODS: 6 trained, experienced research assistants read all issues of 171 journals for the publishing year 2000. Each article was rated using purpose and quality indicators and categorized into clinically relevant original studies, review articles, general papers, or case reports. The original and review articles were then categorized as 'pass' or 'fail' for methodologic rigor in the areas of therapy/quality improvement, diagnosis, prognosis, causation, economics, clinical prediction, and qualitative and review articles. Search strategies developed in 1991 were tested in the 2000 database.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, precision, and accuracy of the search strategies.
RESULTS: Search strategies developed in 1991 generally performed at least as well in 2000 for both best single terms and combinations of terms for high-sensitivity MEDLINE searches for studies of treatment, prognosis, etiology and diagnosis. For example, the accuracy of "clinical trial (pt)" rose from 91.6% to 94.4% (P<0.05) for retrieving high-quality studies of treatments.
CONCLUSION: Most MEDLINE search strategies developed in 1991 are robust when searching in the publishing year 2000.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Management of Latent Tuberculosis Infection.JAMA 2023 January 20
The Difficult Airway Redefined.Prehospital and Disaster Medicine 2022 November 10
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
Read by QxMD is copyright © 2021 QxMD Software Inc. All rights reserved. By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app