Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Proxy reporting of quality of life using the EQ-5D.

Medical Care 2002 December
BACKGROUND: The economic evaluation of health interventions for older people is complicated by the difficulty in obtaining self-reports of quality of life from persons with cognitive impairments, physical impairments, or both.

OBJECTIVES: Using the EQ-5D (EuroQoL) measures, to assess: (1) agreement between subjects and proxies on subject's quality of life ratings at different points in time; (2) agreement between subjects and proxies on change of subject's quality of life ratings over time; and (3) subject and proxy characteristics related to agreement.

RESEARCH DESIGN: Prospective study of subjects visiting hospital emergency departments (ED). Data were collected at enrollment in the ED and at follow-up, 1 and 4 months after the ED visit.

SUBJECTS: The study comprised 231 pairs of cognitively intact patients aged 65 years or older and their primary caregivers.

MEASURES: Quality of life was measured using both components of the EQ-5D scale, the index score and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Demographic characteristics and health status (physical and mental) were measured for both subjects and proxies. Subjects and proxies were interviewed either in English or French.

RESULTS: There was low to moderate agreement between subjects and proxies at different points in time (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] = 0.22 to 0.59), and between subject and proxy change scores over time (ICC = 0-0.50), on both the index score and the VAS. Better agreement between subjects and proxies was found at the 4 months follow-up, when the subject was less depressed, and when the proxy's native language was English.

CONCLUSIONS: Proxy EQ-5D responses, either for a specific point in time or for assessing change over time, may not be valid measures of self-reported quality of life among older medically-ill patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app