We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Survival in familial dysautonomia: Impact of early intervention.
Journal of Pediatrics 2002 October
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of advances in supportive centralized care on survival and function in patients with familial dysautonomia (FD).
STUDY DESIGN: From September l, 1969 through January 1, 2001. Five hundred fifty-one patients with FD entered the Dysautonomia Center. We divided the group into two cohorts: the first cohort (n = 227) entered until March 1, 1981, and the second cohort (n = 324) entered after March 1, 1981. Survival curves were compared by using log-rank tests. Demographic and disease characteristics were examined, including gender, geographic location, age at entry, birth weight, breath-holding history, age of walking, causes of death, and social data.
RESULTS: For both cohorts age at entry was the primary variable that influenced survival; mortality increased by 3% per year. Survival time lengthened for cohort 2 when survival time was defined as time from entry into the Center to last observation or death; in cohort 2, mortality was 73% that of cohort 1 even after adjustment for age at entry. Although survival improved, causes of death were unchanged; sleep deaths and sudden deaths remained frequent.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the more recent cohort patients were younger at the time of entry and had improved survival, which suggests that early access to centralized and more advanced treatment appreciably benefits patients with familial dysautonomia.
STUDY DESIGN: From September l, 1969 through January 1, 2001. Five hundred fifty-one patients with FD entered the Dysautonomia Center. We divided the group into two cohorts: the first cohort (n = 227) entered until March 1, 1981, and the second cohort (n = 324) entered after March 1, 1981. Survival curves were compared by using log-rank tests. Demographic and disease characteristics were examined, including gender, geographic location, age at entry, birth weight, breath-holding history, age of walking, causes of death, and social data.
RESULTS: For both cohorts age at entry was the primary variable that influenced survival; mortality increased by 3% per year. Survival time lengthened for cohort 2 when survival time was defined as time from entry into the Center to last observation or death; in cohort 2, mortality was 73% that of cohort 1 even after adjustment for age at entry. Although survival improved, causes of death were unchanged; sleep deaths and sudden deaths remained frequent.
CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the more recent cohort patients were younger at the time of entry and had improved survival, which suggests that early access to centralized and more advanced treatment appreciably benefits patients with familial dysautonomia.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app