Clinical Trial
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Use of a handheld computer by respiratory care practitioners to improve the efficiency of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation.

Critical Care Medicine 2002 September
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of a handheld computer containing a unit-specific weaning protocol on the efficiency of weaning patients from mechanical ventilation.

DESIGN: A prospective before-after study design with consecutive control and intervention time periods.

SETTING: A medical intensive care unit of an urban teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS: All patients receiving mechanical ventilation in the medical intensive care unit were eligible for study enrollment.

INTERVENTIONS: Weaning of mechanical ventilation during the control period was conducted by respiratory care practitioners using a previously published protocol (n = 176). During the intervention period, respiratory care practitioners weaned patients using a handheld computer version of the same protocol (n = 176).

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: The time for the first spontaneous breathing trial to occur was significantly shorter during the intervention period compared with the control period (49.9 +/- 63.2 hrs vs. 72.5 +/- 86.9 hrs, p=.018). The percentage of patients undergoing a spontaneous breathing trial when first meeting established criteria for a spontaneous breathing trial was significantly greater during the intervention period (89.8% vs. 63.6%, p<.001). Length of stay in the intensive care unit was also significantly shorter for patients during the intervention period (6.2 +/- 7.1 days vs. 7.7 +/- 8.0 days, p=.018).

CONCLUSIONS: This experience suggests that respiratory care practitioners employing a weaning protocol programmed on a handheld computer can wean patients from mechanical ventilation more efficiently compared with the use of a paper-based weaning protocol.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app