We have located links that may give you full text access.
[Millard gingivoperiosteoplasty. An alternative to osteoplasty of alveolar clefts].
PURPOSE: The gingivoperiosteoplasty according to Millard is a possible alternative treatment modality to osteoplasty; no second operation for harvesting the bone graft is necessary. The goal of this investigation was the comparison of gingivoperiosteoplasty with osteoplasty and a search for factors that led to an improvement of the prognosis of both techniques.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Long-term results of 53 patients with 72 alveolar clefts who underwent gingivoperiosteoplasty and 74 patients with 103 clefts of the alveolus were analyzed radiographically following an osteoplasty at the age of 12-14 years. The amount of bone in the alveolar cleft was determined and related to a number of factors such as number of teeth, unilateral or bilateral cleft, and orthodontic treatment. The statistical analysis was done with the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: The rate of success was similar following gingivoperiosteoplasty and osteoplasty with a range of 68% to 73%. A postsurgical orthodontic expansion of the alveolus and the existence of lateral incisors improved the prognosis for both techniques significantly (p < 0.05). Teeth erupted into the new periosteally formed bone. This was observed in 82% of those patients in whom enough bone was formed.
CONCLUSION: The gingivoperiosteoplasty according to Millard is a real alternative to a common osteoplasty at the age of 12-years if a lateral incisor is found at both cleft margins and if postsurgical orthodontic expansion of the upper jaw is performed.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Long-term results of 53 patients with 72 alveolar clefts who underwent gingivoperiosteoplasty and 74 patients with 103 clefts of the alveolus were analyzed radiographically following an osteoplasty at the age of 12-14 years. The amount of bone in the alveolar cleft was determined and related to a number of factors such as number of teeth, unilateral or bilateral cleft, and orthodontic treatment. The statistical analysis was done with the Mann-Whitney U-test (p < 0.05).
RESULTS: The rate of success was similar following gingivoperiosteoplasty and osteoplasty with a range of 68% to 73%. A postsurgical orthodontic expansion of the alveolus and the existence of lateral incisors improved the prognosis for both techniques significantly (p < 0.05). Teeth erupted into the new periosteally formed bone. This was observed in 82% of those patients in whom enough bone was formed.
CONCLUSION: The gingivoperiosteoplasty according to Millard is a real alternative to a common osteoplasty at the age of 12-years if a lateral incisor is found at both cleft margins and if postsurgical orthodontic expansion of the upper jaw is performed.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app