We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, U.S. GOV'T, NON-P.H.S.
Impact of minority status following traumatic spinal cord injury.
NeuroRehabilitation 2002
OBJECTIVE: To interpret the data from the Spinal Cord Injury-Model Systems as it applies to demographics, incidence and functional outcomes of minority patients with spinal cord injury.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers.
RESULTS: Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and proportions were computed for all relevant variables. Participants were grouped into two categories for purposes of analysis, non-minorities (white) and minorities, who were >90% African American. Differential statistics were used for comparisons with regard to demographics, etiology, sponsor of care, length of stay, charges, ASIA Motor Index scores, and FIM scores. Categorical data was analyzed using chi-square analyses while continuous data were analyzed using ANOVA procedures. Analyses revealed significant differences between minorities and non-minorities in terms of age at injury, gender, marital status, employment status, education level, health insurance provider, injury severity, etiology, and discharge disposition.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of the data indicates that violence is the leading single cause of spinal cord injury in minority patients admitted to the model systems centers. The majority of patients who sustained spinal cord injury secondary to violence were minorities with the following demographics: young, single, unemployed males, with less than a high school education, residing in an urban area.
DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of patients admitted to acute inpatient rehabilitation Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems Centers.
RESULTS: Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and proportions were computed for all relevant variables. Participants were grouped into two categories for purposes of analysis, non-minorities (white) and minorities, who were >90% African American. Differential statistics were used for comparisons with regard to demographics, etiology, sponsor of care, length of stay, charges, ASIA Motor Index scores, and FIM scores. Categorical data was analyzed using chi-square analyses while continuous data were analyzed using ANOVA procedures. Analyses revealed significant differences between minorities and non-minorities in terms of age at injury, gender, marital status, employment status, education level, health insurance provider, injury severity, etiology, and discharge disposition.
CONCLUSION: Analysis of the data indicates that violence is the leading single cause of spinal cord injury in minority patients admitted to the model systems centers. The majority of patients who sustained spinal cord injury secondary to violence were minorities with the following demographics: young, single, unemployed males, with less than a high school education, residing in an urban area.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app