We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
VALIDATION STUDIES
Severe aortic valve stenosis with preserved and reduced systolic left ventricular function: diagnostic usefulness of the Tei index.
Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 2002 September
BACKGROUND: In patients with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), the onset of heart failure is associated with increased mortality and higher operative risk. Heart failure may result from either systolic, diastolic, or "overall" left ventricular dysfunction. The index "isovolumic contraction time and isovolumic relaxation time divided by ejection time" was shown to be a sensitive indicator of "overall" cardiac dysfunction in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy and cardiac amyloidosis. We sought to define the role of the Tei index in patients with severe AS and to validate this index against conventional measures of systolic and diastolic LV function.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three participants underwent left heart catheterization for invasive measurement of LV end-diastolic pressure as a marker of diastolic function: 10 AS patients (valve orifice 0.6 +/- 0.2 qcm) with depressed systolic LV function (defined by LV ejection fraction < or = 45% [mean 32% +/- 8%], 7 male/3 female, 72 +/- 10 years old, DAS group), 22 AS patients (valve orifice 0.7 +/- 0.2 qcm) with preserved systolic LV function (ejection fraction > 45% [mean 55% +/- 6%], 13 male/9 female, 71 +/- 11 years old, PAS group) and 21 asymptomatic control participants (ejection fraction > 45% [mean 62% +/- 8%], 14 male/7 female, 66 +/- 8 years old, CON group). Within 24 hours from catheterization, conventional 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examination including measurement of the Tei index was performed.
RESULTS: LV end-diastolic pressure was elevated in the DAS and in the PAS group in comparison with control participants (32 +/- 6 mm Hg and 22 +/- 7 mm Hg vs 11 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively, P <.01 for both comparisons). DAS patients were in a higher New York Heart Association functional class than PAS patients (3.2 +/- 0.4 vs 2.2 +/- 0.4, P <.001) The Tei index was easily and reproducibly obtained in all study participants. In the DAS group, isovolumic contraction time was prolonged and ejection time was shortened in comparison with the CON group (102 +/- 20 ms vs 52 +/- 15 ms, P <.01; and 235 +/- 44 ms vs 316 +/- 45 ms, P <.01), resulting in a significantly increased Tei index (0.78 +/- 0.28 vs 0.40 +/- 0.11, P <.01). In the PAS group, isovolumic relaxation time was shortened (62 +/- 18 ms vs 81 +/- 26 ms for the CON group, P <.01) and ejection time was prolonged (335 +/- 34 ms vs 316 +/- 45 ms for the CON group, P <.05), resulting in a decreased Tei index (0.29 +/- 0.12 vs 0.40 +/- 0.11, P <.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the Tei index yielded an area under the curve of 0.98 +/- 0.03 for separating DAS and PAS patients. Using a Tei index greater than 0.42 as a cutoff, DAS patients were identified with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91%.
CONCLUSION: The Tei index is significantly increased in patients with severe AS and depressed overall cardiac LV function. In AS patients with predominant diastolic dysfunction, in whom systolic function is preserved, the index is decreased in comparison with control patients. The index differentiates between symptomatic AS patients with depressed and less symptomatic AS patients with preserved systolic LV function, and may thus provide relevant information in the work-up and care of such patients.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-three participants underwent left heart catheterization for invasive measurement of LV end-diastolic pressure as a marker of diastolic function: 10 AS patients (valve orifice 0.6 +/- 0.2 qcm) with depressed systolic LV function (defined by LV ejection fraction < or = 45% [mean 32% +/- 8%], 7 male/3 female, 72 +/- 10 years old, DAS group), 22 AS patients (valve orifice 0.7 +/- 0.2 qcm) with preserved systolic LV function (ejection fraction > 45% [mean 55% +/- 6%], 13 male/9 female, 71 +/- 11 years old, PAS group) and 21 asymptomatic control participants (ejection fraction > 45% [mean 62% +/- 8%], 14 male/7 female, 66 +/- 8 years old, CON group). Within 24 hours from catheterization, conventional 2-dimensional and Doppler echocardiographic examination including measurement of the Tei index was performed.
RESULTS: LV end-diastolic pressure was elevated in the DAS and in the PAS group in comparison with control participants (32 +/- 6 mm Hg and 22 +/- 7 mm Hg vs 11 +/- 4 mm Hg, respectively, P <.01 for both comparisons). DAS patients were in a higher New York Heart Association functional class than PAS patients (3.2 +/- 0.4 vs 2.2 +/- 0.4, P <.001) The Tei index was easily and reproducibly obtained in all study participants. In the DAS group, isovolumic contraction time was prolonged and ejection time was shortened in comparison with the CON group (102 +/- 20 ms vs 52 +/- 15 ms, P <.01; and 235 +/- 44 ms vs 316 +/- 45 ms, P <.01), resulting in a significantly increased Tei index (0.78 +/- 0.28 vs 0.40 +/- 0.11, P <.01). In the PAS group, isovolumic relaxation time was shortened (62 +/- 18 ms vs 81 +/- 26 ms for the CON group, P <.01) and ejection time was prolonged (335 +/- 34 ms vs 316 +/- 45 ms for the CON group, P <.05), resulting in a decreased Tei index (0.29 +/- 0.12 vs 0.40 +/- 0.11, P <.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for the Tei index yielded an area under the curve of 0.98 +/- 0.03 for separating DAS and PAS patients. Using a Tei index greater than 0.42 as a cutoff, DAS patients were identified with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91%.
CONCLUSION: The Tei index is significantly increased in patients with severe AS and depressed overall cardiac LV function. In AS patients with predominant diastolic dysfunction, in whom systolic function is preserved, the index is decreased in comparison with control patients. The index differentiates between symptomatic AS patients with depressed and less symptomatic AS patients with preserved systolic LV function, and may thus provide relevant information in the work-up and care of such patients.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app