Comparative Study
Journal Article
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Combined coronary artery bypass with carotid endarterectomy: do women have worse outcomes?

OBJECTIVE: Women undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have higher mortality and morbidity in numerous studies. Although controversial, similar results have been seen in women undergoing carotid endarterectomy. We examined the results of combined eversion CEA/CABG by one group to analyze if the outcome is different between men and women in this setting.

METHOD: The records of all patients undergoing combined eversion CEA/CABG were reviewed from our vascular registry between January 1992 and January 2001. Indications, demographics, morbidity, and mortality were retrieved. These results were compared on the basis of gender as well as to patients undergoing CEA alone. Significance was assessed using Theta(2) analysis.

RESULTS: There were 563 combined eversion CEA/CABG procedures performed over the 9-year study period: 324 in men and 239 in women. Asymptomatic >70% stenosis was seen in 275 (85%) male patients and 215 (90%) female patients (P = not significant [NS]). Stroke was found in four men vs three women (1.2% vs 1.3%, P = NS), whereas death occurred in 13 men and five women (4.0% vs 2.1%, P = NS). Thirty-day stroke/mortality was 4.9% in men vs 3.3% in women (P = NS). During the same period, patients undergoing CEA alone were subject to a stroke-mortality rate of 1.6% in men and 1.2% in women (P = NS).

CONCLUSION: This series demonstrated no difference in outcome among patients undergoing combined eversion CEA/CABG procedures on the basis of gender. Although the results demonstrate a significantly higher mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing combined procedures when compared to carotid surgery alone, the combined procedures can be performed safely in both genders. The large number of asymptomatic patients in both the combined and solo procedures may have positively influenced these results.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app